article thumbnail

Design Patent Obviousness in the Automotive Industry - LKQ Corp. v. GM Global Technology Operations LLC and the Rosen-Durling Test

JD Supra Law

GM Global Technology Operations LLC has brought attention to the ongoing debate surrounding design patent law, particularly with respect to the Rosen-Durling test for design patent obviousness.

article thumbnail

Challenging The Design Patent Obviousness Test: LKQ  v. GM En Banc Oral Argument

JD Supra Law

GM Global Technology Operations LLC - As an initial disclaimer, Irwin IP LLP is privileged to be lead counsel for LKQ Corporation and Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. collectively, “LKQ”) in several design patent infringement matters, including this case against GM Global Technology Operations and by extension General Motors Co.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Challenging The Design Patent Obviousness Test: Debunking the Rationale for Low Rejection Rates 

JD Supra Law

GM Global Technology Operations LLC - As an initial disclaimer, Irwin IP LLP is privileged to be lead counsel for LKQ Corporation and Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. collectively, “LKQ”) in several design patent validity disputes, including this case against GM Global Technology Operations and by extension General Motors Co.

article thumbnail

Patent Poetry: Will Federal Circuit Soften Test for Design Patent Obviousness?

JD Supra Law

An en banc panel of the Federal Circuit recently heard arguments in a case that could change how courts assess design patents for “obviousness.” LKQ Corporation and GM Global Technology Operations LLC are engaged in a dispute over GM’s design patent for a vehicle fender. By: AEON Law

article thumbnail

Full Federal Circuit to Review Challenge to Test for Design Patent Obviousness

IP Watchdog

GM Global Technology Operations, which affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) ruling that LKQ failed to show by a preponderance of the evidence that GM’s design patent was anticipated or would have been obvious. Patent D855,508 covers a “vehicle front skid bar.”

article thumbnail

2023 Design Patents Year in Review: Analysis & Trends: U.S. District Courts: Significant Design Patent Cases on District Court Docket in 2023

JD Supra Law

There were patent- and case-dispositive design patent decisions across a range of venues and at a range of case postures, including claim construction rulings, summary judgment decisions, and even multiple jury trials. Ltd, North Star Technology v. Techtronic Industries Co., Latham Pool Products, Inc.,

article thumbnail

LKQ En Banc Argument Suggests CAFC Could Soften Test for Design Patent Obviousness

IP Watchdog

government and GM Global Technology Operations in a case that could change the test for assessing design patent obviousness. The so-called Rosen-Durling test for design patent obviousness requires that, first, under In re Rosen (C.C.P.A., An en banc panel of the U.S. Next, under Durling v. Spectrum Furniture Co.,