Remove privacy-policy
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (April 29- May 05)

SpicyIP

The claim of the appellant was that the Controller has failed to realize that impugned invention has already been claimed by the appellant in an earlier patent application and thus, pre-grant opposition should stand on the grounds of anticipation by prior art under Section 25, Patents Act, 1970. Today Network Limited And Anr.

article thumbnail

Legal Implications of IPR Protection ‘In The Cloud’: an Indian Analysis

IIPRD

Moreover, IP rights are inherently territorial, creating problems for IP owners who use cloud computing, such as their patented inventions being used or infringed in multiple locations without their consent or knowledge. This Act bears resemblance to the GDPR [9] , acknowledged as the most stringent security and privacy law globally.