article thumbnail

White House Directs Copyright Office and USPTO to Provide Guidance on AI-Related Issues

LexBlog IP

This comes amidst a backdrop where AI models currently cannot be recognized as inventors, a stance reaffirmed in the Federal Circuit decision Thaler v. Fair Use: The Executive Order encourages data sharing and research. This raises questions about the ownership and fair use of AI-discovered orphan works.

article thumbnail

White House Directs Copyright Office and USPTO to Provide Guidance on AI-Related Issues

Trading Secrets

This comes amidst a backdrop where AI models currently cannot be recognized as inventors, a stance reaffirmed in the Federal Circuit decision Thaler v. Fair Use: The Executive Order encourages data sharing and research. This raises questions about the ownership and fair use of AI-discovered orphan works.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

White House Directs Copyright Office and USPTO to Provide Guidance on AI-Related Issues

LexBlog IP

This comes amidst a backdrop where AI models currently cannot be recognized as inventors, a stance reaffirmed in the Federal Circuit decision Thaler v. Fair Use: The Executive Order encourages data sharing and research. This raises questions about the ownership and fair use of AI-discovered orphan works.

article thumbnail

Some Thoughts on Five Pending AI Litigations – Avoiding Squirrels and Other AI Distractions

Velocity of Content

As a person involved in copyright on a daily basis, I’ve observed a number of events and requests for comment over the last few years on the issue of whether artificial intelligence (AI) systems can be “authors” in the copyright sense (or inventors of patents). I speculated that this was an attempt to avoid a messy fair use dispute.

article thumbnail

How to Protect Software as Intellectual Property

LexBlog IP

Non-disclosure Agreements (NDAs) for Ownership. A trademark cannot be used to protect an invention, coding, or software program. Oracle Supreme Court Decision , where the Court determined that Google’s copying of 11,500 lines of Oracle’s Java SE code was indeed fair use of that material as a matter of law.

article thumbnail

“What’s Mine Is Not Yours To Give Me”—Nor To Take Without Just Compensation: A New Jersey’s Reaction To Sovereign Immunity, Intellectual Property, & Takings

LexBlog IP

26 , rejected the claim that taking away, or ignoring, the ability-to-control indicia of ownership amounts to a taking: Similarly, property rights, including copyright, have been described as ownership of a bundle of rights or interests. The government is not using the patent, but the patented technology. Nation Enters.,