Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog
JUNE 23, 2022
While the copyright conditions in the user agreements of the applications in question are always important, it will be assumed for the purposes of this post that the apps do not claim ownership through these user agreements. Ownership of copyright in the lectures presented by the speakers. Fair use; webinar recordings.
SpicyIP
DECEMBER 6, 2023
2(c), the fair use exemption thereof under Sec. 52(1)(t); and (ii) if yes, whether the proviso of the same or ‘fixation requirement’ excludes it from the scope of fair use. Lastly, I will discuss the argument of moral rights of the author in contending the ‘fair use exemption’ of their work.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
43(B)log
AUGUST 16, 2021
There was no controversy as to whether Pasadena had an “ownership” interest in the relevant trademarks. Pasadena said this was (1) nominative fair use and (2) an expressive work protected by the First Amendment. The Instagram post was before the court and was NFU.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
AUGUST 16, 2023
This paradigm, however, breaks down when copyright ownership is contested. In that circumstance, the takedown notice becomes a proxy battle for a larger and likely fact-dependent war over ownership, which the service in the middle isn’t in a good position to resolve. Weiner * Fair Use – It’s the Law (for what it’s worth)–Lenz v.
LexBlog IP
APRIL 18, 2022
Supreme Court recently granted a petition for writ of certiorari (docket, here ) to review the extent to which a work of art is a “transformative” fair use under the Copyright Act. When Prince died in 2016, Vanity Fair’s parent company sought permission from the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc.
43(B)log
AUGUST 11, 2021
Twain thought he should have ownership of his lectures—“my lecture was my property.” Did Twain make fair use? There’s some transformation in organization; used entire work/market substitute so Cord wouldn’t be able to sell her narrative a publisher. Searching for any surviving descendants. Random House (NY Ct App 1968).
Dear Rich IP Blog
JANUARY 16, 2024
I have read that the "change of ownership" of this collection is considered a publication. The library wants money to use these items in our play/movie. Does paying the library for their use put the burden of ownership/copyright on them? Transfer of ownership ≠ transfer of copyright. Is that correct?
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content