Fair Use Licensing Ownership Television 
Plagiarism Today
MAY 19, 2022
claimed that they held 50% ownership in the work, given to them by a producer named Greg Mathieson who worked on the album. 2: Delhi HC Seeks Expert Help on Whether Event Firms Need License to Play Music at Weddings. The 3 Count Logo was created by Justin Goff and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
MAY 30, 2022
Finally, it points out Viacom is the owner of three valid trademark registrations for the KRUSTY KRAB mark and 400 copyright registrations covering “creative aspects of the SpongeBob SquarePants franchise,” including episodes from the animated television series, movies, drawings, and stylebooks featuring artwork from the franchise.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
TorrentFreak
APRIL 12, 2024
The latter simply cannot exist without the former; the big legal debate seems to hang on whether consumption was protected under the doctrine of fair use, or was straightforward copyright infringement. If the court finds in favor of fair use, it seems likely that no copyright holders will receive compensation.
Copyright Lately
AUGUST 2, 2022
And unlike the vast majority of songwriters and performing artists who have relinquished ownership rights to musical publishers and record labels, Barlow & Bear decided to release “The Unofficial Bridgerton Musical” themselves, which means keeping more of the earnings. Was it a license on the world’s greatest terms?
SpicyIP
JULY 29, 2021
Historically, the exceptions for teaching, education and research have never been qualified by the nature of ownership of the institution where the use of the work is carried out. To put things in perspective, even the most IP-friendly jurisdiction of US in Cambridge v. According to the AISHE Report 2019-20, 66.3%
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
DECEMBER 15, 2021
To settle that dispute, the parties worked out an “exclusive” license: the second-comer could sell the design on Amazon, and the registrant could keep selling it on eBay. The second comer/licensee assigned the exclusive license to a successor licensee, the defendant in this case. Signal 23 Television v. assertions.
LexBlog IP
APRIL 13, 2022
2] Dash originally planned to use SuperFarm, an NFT website, to mint and sell the NFT of the album. [3] On August 6, Roc-A-Fella filed an amended complaint, naming GoDigital, a company to which Dash allegedly granted the right to license Reasonable Doubt to certain websites, as a co-defendant. [13] Miramax LLC v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
215 
Let's personalize your content