Plagiarism Today
MAY 19, 2022
claimed that they held 50% ownership in the work, given to them by a producer named Greg Mathieson who worked on the album. appeared first on Plagiarism Today. The case dates back to 2013 when Basil filed a notice of copyright termination on the album and her song. However, a UK company named Stillwater Ltd.
Plagiarism Today
OCTOBER 4, 2022
However, the important thing to know is that there was no doubt that Take-Two did copy the tattoos in question and there was no question of Alexander’s ownership of them. Fair Use – That the use of the tattoos was a fair use, meaning that the use was transformative enough to not be an infringement of the original work.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JULY 5, 2022
Soon after, an entity called Bayside asserted copyright ownership of the photos and sent 512(c)(3) takedown notices to Twitter followed by a 512(h) subpoena to unmask CallMeMoneyBags. ” Second, Bayside said that copyright already accommodates First Amendment considerations via the fair use defense (citing the Reddit case ).
BYU Copyright Blog
MARCH 18, 2024
After a series of emails, Wilder filed a formal complaint with CUNY in March 2020, alleging academic misconduct and plagiarism on Hoilands part. The evidence Wilder submitted to establish valid copyright ownership indicated that she actually may not be the valid copyright owner.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
AUGUST 7, 2023
2] At one end of the spectrum, we find plagiarism: a completely derivative work that fails to contribute any creative elements to the original piece. In this case, the author of the original work retains ownership of the original, while the author of the derivative work holds rights to the creative additions they have made.
43(B)log
AUGUST 3, 2023
Matthew Sag, Copyright Safety for Generative AI Not addressing whether training is always fair use in every circumstance; explain how generative AI fits w/in existing law (nonexpressive uses) and identify best practices to make generative AI fairer. Implications: too much memorization undermines arguments in favor of fair use.
43(B)log
AUGUST 11, 2022
Cross-cultural plagiarism: adaptation of a film to a different cultural context. Another use: branding function for purposes of parody/humorously assert rights or ownership. Implications: insight into understanding of TM by ordinary citizens; does it create misconceptions about ownership? Can the NFAI screen the movie?
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
215 
Let's personalize your content