43(B)log

DECEMBER 23, 2021

12, 2021) After Lexmark , can a competitor bring a false association claim when the false association is with an unrelated third party? This court answers yes, though limits the effect of that by applying what looks like ordinary false advertising analysis.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Designs 59

43(B)log

JANUARY 17, 2023

False advertising: Sybersound Recs., 2008), held that misrepresentations about copyright licensing status did not relate to the “nature, characteristics, and quality” of a good under §43(a)(1)(B), unlike “the visual and audio quality of the good.” Copyright ownership information is CMI. 3d 1137 (9th Cir.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Ownership Copyright Copying 59

The IPKat

JUNE 13, 2022

Digital assets can be protected by IP and have always been capable of being licensed or assigned via a contract, or protected as a trade mark. For example, the owners of the famous “ Grumpy Cat ” meme licensed the use of the name, image and likeness of the cat – and successfully enforced these rights.

Non-Fungible Tokens 140

Non-Fungible Tokens Advertising Advertising Ownership 140

The IPKat

JUNE 27, 2022

On 24 June 2022, BAYC sued Ryder Ripps, a conceptual artist and NFT creator for trade mark infringement, unfair competition, false advertising, cybersquatting and other cause of actions before the Central District of California. This is a U.S

Non-Fungible Tokens 135

Non-Fungible Tokens Contracts Copying Art 135

43(B)log

OCTOBER 4, 2021

WPI counterclaimed against Restellini and third-party Institut Restellini SAS – Documentation Centre alleging copyright infringement and false advertising. In 2017, WI granted WPI an automatically renewable, exclusive license to use and exploit the content of all of WI’s materials, including the Modigliani material.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Artwork IP Advertising 59

IIPRD

AUGUST 4, 2022

However, in order to have legal proof of ownership, it is always advisable to register for copyright registration. If the Artist had registered his work as Copyright, he would have had legal proof of ownership in this situation. Obtain legal ownership verification. False advertising should be avoided when defaming a product.

Social Media 45

Social Media Intellectual Property Non-Fungible Tokens Music 45

43(B)log

MARCH 23, 2023

“Regardless of which device is used to access digital content, or which ‘iTunes’ app is used to buy or rent the digital content, the app provides a tab or folder labeled ‘purchased.’ ” But when third parties terminate their licensing agreements with Apple, Apple “must revoke [a] consumer[’s] access” to purchased digital content “without warning.”

Licensing 72

Licensing Advertising Advertising Ownership 72

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 18, 2022

A: False advertising context: FTC/state AGs. Jim Gibson: Connection to other forms of abandonment through naked licensing/transfer in gross—it’s difficult to find standing b/c you have to find someone willing to take a chance. Consumer standing: how do you propose showing consumers are actually affected?

Trademark 59

Trademark False Advertising Fair Use Branding 59

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

[Delhi High Court] On May 23, the Delhi High Court passed an interesting jud gement on the issue of ownership of the copyright in a film screenplay and held that the copyright in the screenplay of the film ‘Nayak’, lay with Satyajit Ray and on his demise, with his son Sandip Ray and the Society for Preservation of Satyajit Ray Archives (SPSRA).

IP 124

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 124

43(B)log

AUGUST 3, 2023

Most common reason: change of ownership or structure, merger, acquisition, sponsorship change, shift from private to public, demerger Change in corporate strategy—globalization or localization, diversify or divest. Sheff: What about licensing/merchandising in this system? A single user can obfuscate its past identity from its present.

Social Media 52

Social Media Fair Use Advertising Advertising 52

43(B)log

OCTOBER 4, 2021

For about a decade, courts had realized that IIC had gone way too far, and had expanded liability in ways that didn’t protect consumers and facilitated anticompetitive claims about false advertising. May 20, 2021) (R&R) renting existing equipment; Pine was formerly one of Proactive’s licensed distributors for the pumps.

IP 94

IP Trademark Advertising Advertising 94