article thumbnail

Retailer has standing to assert Lanham Act false advertising claims against its own supplier

43(B)log

In summer 2020, AHBP began negotiating with the Lynd defendants for the exclusive license to market and sell a surface disinfectant/cleaner known as “Bioprotect 500” in Argentina. Lynd advertised the Product as effective against the coronavirus. the Lanham Act false advertising claim survived.

article thumbnail

falsely advertising "proprietary" and "exclusive" material isn't actionable under Dastar

43(B)log

Baden, a basketball manufacturer, argued that Molten had engaged in false advertising when Molten claimed that its basketballs were ‘innovative,’ ‘exclusive,’ and ‘proprietary’ when its ‘innovative’ layer of padding beneath the cover was invented by Baden, not Molten.”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Press release touting preliminary injunction can found false advertising counterclaims

43(B)log

ZimVie intervened and counterclaimed for declaratory judgment of invalidity, cancellation fo the color marks registration, declaratory judgment of noninfringement, false advertising under the Lanham Act and California law, and tortious interference.

article thumbnail

Noncommercial speakers can be liable for contributory false advertising

43(B)log

25, 2022) I know it probably seems sometimes like I approve of every expansive use of false advertising law, but sometimes even I find an aggressive position to go too far. De Simone then split from VSL, which eventually lost the license for the De Simone Formulation and attempted to reverse engineer it/replace it.

article thumbnail

Falsely advertising "ghost guns" as legal in NY is actionable

43(B)log

Defendants who had federal firearms licenses had access to, but did not use, the National Instant Criminal Background Check System before selling unfinished frames and receivers to New York consumers, while some defendants weren’t licensed to sell firearms at all.

article thumbnail

9th Circuit finds noncompetitor lacks statutory standing in nondisparagement false advertising case

43(B)log

2, 2022) The court of appeals upholds the rejection of ThermoLife’s false advertising claims (Lanham Act and Florida’s FDUTPA) on statutory standing grounds. It sells compounds/licenses its technology for use in sports nutrition supplements, while BPI produces its own dietary supplements.

article thumbnail

California Supreme Court reaffirms strict liability for false advertising in Serova

43(B)log

The First Amendment has long coexisted with no-fault false advertising laws. Citing Dastar and Rogers ; noting in a footnote that Dastar suggested that Lanham Act false advertising claims might sometimes govern statements about artistic provenance without raising any First Amendment concern.]