Remove False Advertising Remove Marketing Remove Registering Trademarks Remove Trademark
article thumbnail

gray marketer's counterclaims against Toyota survive, but it still must defend itself

43(B)log

Toyota USA sued Allen for grey marketing in violation of the Lanham Act and related claims, asserting that material differences included the existence of a manufacturer-backed warranty, the shipping and packaging of the parts, and the appearance and condition of the parts. 14, 2023) This is the trademark side of the case.

article thumbnail

IIC decision also says some things about false advertising: materiality may not be presumed from literal falsity

43(B)log

I won’t say much about that, though I do have a big question, but there are also false advertising aspects of the case. The parties compete in the market for adjustable air mattresses and related products. Plaintiffs’ registered trademarks include “SLEEP NUMBER”, “WHAT’S YOUR SLEEP NUMBER”, “SELECT COMFORT”, and “COMFORTAIRE.”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Imputing Bad Faith in Trademark Infringement Disputes: Analysing DHC Nova v. Novya Judgement

SpicyIP

Image from here In the case of Sterling Agro Industries Limited vs ASR Trading Company , the Delhi High Court while dealing with a trademark infringement suit, imputed mala fide intention to ASR Trading’s (the Defendant) act of applying for a trademark registration. His previous posts can be accessed here.

article thumbnail

calling an accepted Rule 68 offer a judgment of infringement could be defamatory

43(B)log

11, 2024) I have a long-running interest in Rule 68 offers of judgment, and this case involves an interaction with false advertising law! The parties compete in the shoe market. Crocs, Inc., 2024 WL 1051951No. 23-cv-01790-PAB-KAS (D. In 2006, Crocs sued now-plaintiff Double Diamond and Dawgs, its affiliate.

article thumbnail

truthful statement about role in developing product isn't falsified by later split

43(B)log

Hawrych’s name, likeness, and trademark (‘Hawrych MD’) in various advertisements.” It was not enough to allege that the marketing materials were “misleading as to his present involvement.” Thus, the false advertising claim would be dismissed. The allegations related to the use of “M.D.” Hawrych” and “Dr.

article thumbnail

Cardozo A&ELJ symposium, Trademark

43(B)log

Panel #2, TM, moderated by Vice Dean Felix Wu Jack Daniels says that use as a trademark is special: like copyright’s bête noire, confusion caused by trademark use is the central concern of trademark law. I’ve left out the parts specific to registered trademarks and the reference to treaties. Taco Cabana, from 1992.

article thumbnail

Inter American Convention allows claims that Lanham Act makes dubious after Abitron; but what about Article III?

43(B)log

27, 2023) Industria sued Latinfood for trademark and copyright infringement; Latinfood counterclaimed for tortious interference against Industria and another counterdefendant Cordialsa. Industria De Alimentos Zenu S.A.S. Latinfood U.S. 16-6576 (KM) (MAH), 2023 WL 4200169, -- F. So, did Industria satisfy Lexmark ?