article thumbnail

IIC decision also says some things about false advertising: materiality may not be presumed from literal falsity

43(B)log

I won’t say much about that, though I do have a big question, but there are also false advertising aspects of the case. Plaintiffs’ registered trademarks include “SLEEP NUMBER”, “WHAT’S YOUR SLEEP NUMBER”, “SELECT COMFORT”, and “COMFORTAIRE.” Baxter; 996 F.3d 3d 925 (8 th Cir.

article thumbnail

Imputing Bad Faith in Trademark Infringement Disputes: Analysing DHC Nova v. Novya Judgement

SpicyIP

Image from here In the case of Sterling Agro Industries Limited vs ASR Trading Company , the Delhi High Court while dealing with a trademark infringement suit, imputed mala fide intention to ASR Trading’s (the Defendant) act of applying for a trademark registration. His previous posts can be accessed here.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

gray marketer's counterclaims against Toyota survive, but it still must defend itself

43(B)log

Lanham Act false advertising: Allen alleged that Toyota’s statements that “[t]he purchase. a breach of your dealer agreement” constituted false advertising because the agreement in fact allows for purchases of Toyota parts from other sources, including for non-warranty repairs. Allen Interchange LLC, 2023 WL 5207389, No.

article thumbnail

calling an accepted Rule 68 offer a judgment of infringement could be defamatory

43(B)log

11, 2024) I have a long-running interest in Rule 68 offers of judgment, and this case involves an interaction with false advertising law! This judgment of infringement comes nearly one year to the day after Crocs filed lawsuits against 21 companies alleging infringement of its registered trademark rights in its clog designs. …

article thumbnail

Cardozo A&ELJ symposium, Trademark

43(B)log

Panel #2, TM, moderated by Vice Dean Felix Wu Jack Daniels says that use as a trademark is special: like copyright’s bête noire, confusion caused by trademark use is the central concern of trademark law. I’ve left out the parts specific to registered trademarks and the reference to treaties. Taco Cabana, from 1992.

article thumbnail

Gema USA, Inc. Sues Former Employee for Alleged Patent & Trademark Infringement

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

The United States Patent and Trademark Office issued Patent Nos. is not an authorized Gema distributor and upon information and belief, does not sell “new” Gema products but rather sells knocks-offs using the Gema Trademarks without authorization. First in Finishing, Inc.’s Registration No. Registration Date.

article thumbnail

truthful statement about role in developing product isn't falsified by later split

43(B)log

Hawrych’s name, likeness, and trademark (‘Hawrych MD’) in various advertisements.” Thus, the false advertising claim would be dismissed. False advertising law has a much more structured way of accounting for implications than trademark law does. The allegations related to the use of “M.D.”