Remove firms three-new-square articles
article thumbnail

EMP&A comments on Trade Regulation Rule on Impersonation of Government and Businesses

Erik K Pelton

As a trademark law firm, we represent a wide array of clients but predominantly focus on helping small business owners protect their intellectual property. Pelton & Associates, PLLC (“EMP&A”) is a boutique trademark law firm located in Falls Church, Virginia. About Erik M. Pelton & Associates, PLLC.

article thumbnail

[Guest post] Retromark Volume XII: the last six months in trade marks

The IPKat

Cadbury tried again with three new purple applications, each with a slightly different description. Before this dispute, all three were first tested by the UKIPO, which required that Cadbury prove that they had acquired distinctiveness through use. Cadbury having succeeded on this basis, Nestle opposed them.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The IRIS Network - Our LGBT+ Stories

Herbert Smith Freehills

The Canadian process all went very smoothly and we were on a plane home when Gabriel was three weeks old. We knew we wanted to have two (or three … I am still working on the hubby!) It used to be LGBT and sometimes Q; now there were all these 'new' letters and I was naturally curious. Sophie Rich.

Music 52
article thumbnail

Global IRIS Network: Who We Are

Herbert Smith Freehills

The Canadian process all went very smoothly and we were on a plane home when Gabriel was three weeks old. We knew we wanted to have two (or three … I am still working on the hubby!) It used to be LGBT and sometimes Q; now there were all these 'new' letters and I was naturally curious. Sophie Rich.

Music 52
article thumbnail

The 5th Circuit Puts the 1st Amendment in a Blender & Whips Up a Terrible #MAGA Kool-Aid–NetChoice v. Paxton

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The decision consists of three opinions from a three-judge panel: Judge Oldham’s majority opinion, Judge Jones’ concurrence (mostly), and Judge Southwick’s concurrence on the transparency piece and dissent on the rest. .” In contrast, Texas falsely claimed that ONLY these three services are covered.