Intellectual Property Law Blog

MAY 2, 2023

The AI Bill of Rights is a voluntary, non-binding framework, but federal agencies likely will consider it as they craft guidance and requirements regarding the development and use of artificial intelligence. Copyright Office and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office have developed initiatives to focus on IP issues with AI.

Government 237

Government Business Licensing Copyright 237

SpicyIP

MARCH 11, 2024

Highlights of the Week Hot-Tubbing in Indian IP Litigation: Delhi High Court Issues Directives in High-Stakes Patent Infringement Case Image from [link] here Recently, the DHC issued directives regarding expert evidence in the Perjeta patent litigation. The Patent Act: Catch 22 Does the Patent Act prevail over the Competition Act?

Trademark 59

Trademark Registration Copyright Patent 59

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 5, 2022

We discussed the recent updates in Delhi, Madras and Calcutta High Courts, regarding adjudication of intellectual property right matters. Highlighting the change in roster of the Intellectual Property Division (IPD), we also discussed the progress, with regard to similar arrangements, in Calcutta and Madras High Courts.

Trademark 105

Trademark Registering Trademarks Registration IP 105

LexBlog IP

MARCH 29, 2023

The Federal Circuit has refused to uphold the dismissal of a complaint alleging that the Director of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) improperly issued instructions to PTAB judges regarding whether to institute requested patent review proceedings. ” Precedential Decisions vs. § 553. .

Patent 52

Patent Designs Design Government 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 2, 2023

The AI Bill of Rights is a voluntary, non-binding framework, but federal agencies likely will consider it as they craft guidance and requirements regarding the development and use of artificial intelligence. Copyright Office and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office have developed initiatives to focus on IP issues with AI.

Government 52

Government Business Copyright Licensing 52

SpicyIP

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

The court further held that “mere international usage of the ‘ALPHARD’ trademark by the Petitioner company is not sufficient to prove spillover of its transnational reputation in India” Delhi High Court grants an interim injunction to the Plaintiff, despite non-use of the mark for 30 years.

Designs 52

Designs Design Trademark Cease and Desist 52

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 17, 2023

Sidhi is a final year B.A. From conflicting positions on AI as a co-author of a work to the contours of information required u/s 39 about the patent applications filed abroad, we had some engaging posts on this blog this week. Highlights of the Week By Whom and How Are Our Patent Examiners Being Recruited?

IP 59

IP Trademark Advertising Advertising 59