topics advertising-injury 
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
MARCH 29, 2022
“any injury to the Plaintiff caused by cheating or unfair play in this game was reasonably avoidable, the harm did not affect the public interest, and it did not cause injury to her business or property.” ” Consumer Protection. ” Products Liability. An online videogame isn’t a “product.”
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
DECEMBER 11, 2021
As another example, when the search results provide the records associated with Mr. Abraham, “adjacent to the list of records containing [his] name, photograph, and likeness” is an advertisement promoting the subscription membership. Section 230. ” (Tautology alert). ” 17200. ” (Tautology alert #2). Intrusion into Seclusion.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
43(B)log
MARCH 25, 2024
These warnings “shall comprise the top 50 percent of the front and rear panels of the package” of cigarettes and “at least 20 percent of the area of [any] advertisement.” Also, the government need not choose only the most common side-effect or consequence of the disease or injury discussed in a warning. That is an ideological message.
SpicyIP
MARCH 30, 2023
Dabur further contended that the video specifically targets its ‘Real’ fruit juices by using partially blurred ‘Real’ logo and promotional advertising clips. In the concerned video, an advertisement has been shown which was aired by ‘Real’ and its product has been blurred in the video. In the case of Hindustan Unilever Limited v.
43(B)log
AUGUST 9, 2021
5, 2021) Scilex sells an FDA-approved, prescription-strength topical analgesic self-adhesive patch, ZTlido (lidocaine), which is allegedly often prescribed off-label, including for general neuropathic pain (e.g., back and spinal pain). But that’s not relevant to the lost profits argument, which is part of causation.
LexBlog IP
AUGUST 17, 2022
It is not every day that the FTC sues the CEO of a publicly traded company, and it is even less often that we see a federal court opinion on the topic, so this decision warrants a deep dive. Just because an injury is small does not mean it is not “substantial.” Background.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
MAY 13, 2024
For the trespass to chattels claim, the court quoted Hamidi in saying that “[s]hort of dispossession, personal injury, or physical damages (not present here), intermeddling is actionable only if the chattel is impaired as to its condition, qualify, value, or. the possessor is deprived of the use of the chattel for a substantial time.”
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
112 
Let's personalize your content