Remove topics andy-warhol-foundation-for-the-visual-arts-inc-v-goldsmith
article thumbnail

Does Transformative Matter? No, At Least Where Use Is Commercial

JD Supra Law

Andy Warhol. These were the hot topics in the recently decided Supreme Court case of Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Goldsmith et al., And Prince, the Purple One. (Or Or in this case, Orange.) 598 U.S. _ (2023) (Citations are to the Slip Opinion (“Slip Op.”)).

article thumbnail

Is “A Change [] Gonna Come”?: Music Publishers Sue AI Startup Anthropic for Copyright Infringement

LexBlog IP

This time, a group of music publishing companies, including Concord Music Group, Inc., ABCKO Music, Inc., This time, a group of music publishing companies, including Concord Music Group, Inc., ABCKO Music, Inc., See Concord Music Group, Inc. The Lawsuit Another week, another lawsuit against generative AI.

Music 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Fair Use for Documentaries in US Copyright Law: Brown v Netflix

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Chapman (‘plaintiffs’) collectively filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against Netflix, Amazon, and Apple (‘defendants’), claiming that the defendants had directly and indirectly infringed their copyright over the song “ Fish Sticks n’ Tater Tots ” by using it in their documentary titled ‘Burlesque’ ( Brown v. Netflix , Inc. ).

Fair Use 103
article thumbnail

AIPPI Congress (Report 3): Soft IP update, wine & IP and the metaverse

The IPKat

Bailey (look for an avatar with a Gucci jumpsuit in Roblox) identified the flurry of recent NFT related litigation to be her favorite decisions of last year and identified Hermes Int'l v. On the US side, the metaverse fluent Ms. The case shows clearly that virtual goods can also infringe in the real world. a of the Design Directive.

IP 76
article thumbnail

Does Transformative Matter? No, At Least Where Use Is Commercial

LexBlog IP

Andy Warhol. These were the hot topics in the recently decided Supreme Court case of Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Goldsmith et al. , Warhol and his Foundation’s claim of fair use lost. And Prince, the Purple One. (Or Or in this case, Orange.)

article thumbnail

U.S. Supreme Court Vindicates Photographer But Destabilizes Fair Use — Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Ochoa’s definitive analysis of the Supreme Court’s Warhol opinion. Supreme Court affirmed the Second Circuit’s ruling that the reproduction of Andy Warhol’s Orange Prince on the cover of a magazine tribute was not a fair use of Lynn Goldsmith’s photo of the singer-songwriter Prince, on which the Warhol portrait was based.

article thumbnail

With Warhol, It’s Time to Transform Transformative Use

Copyright Lately

The Warhol case gives the Supreme Court an opportunity to provide balance and flexibility to the doctrine. When I first heard that the Supreme Court had agreed to take up the fair use fight over Andy Warhol’s “Prince Series,” my first reaction was “Oh wow.”. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. ComicMix, LLC. ComicMix, LLC.