Remove topics e-signatures
article thumbnail

[UPDATE] Calls to push back UPC sunrise period as 89% have not been able to obtain/authenticate security devices needed to access Case Management System

The IPKat

The survey has been running for almost a week and garnered several comments and emails on the topic. Claus does have a question on e-signature requirements (which was a recurring theme in the e-mails and comments - see below). of respondents (11) have been able to access the UPC CMS via the strong authentication process.

article thumbnail

Copyrightability Of Players’ Creation In The Gaming Regime

IP and Legal Filings

However, the question of who owns the rights to these creations has been a topic of debate for some time. References Lian Cicily Joseph, Modern Developments in Copyright Law and the Governance of E-Sports, 3.2 References Lian Cicily Joseph, Modern Developments in Copyright Law and the Governance of E-Sports, 3.2 & Tech.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Artists Attack AI: Why The New Lawsuit Goes Too Far

Copyright Lately

Open AI, which created the popular Dall-E 2 program, wasn’t named in the lawsuit, likely because the content of its training data hasn’t been made public. If you’re interested in doing a deeper dive into how all of this works, I recommend following Andres Guadamuz’s blog on the topic.)

article thumbnail

Welcome Back to IP Osgoode: Here’s a Sneak Peek at what’s to come this year

IPilogue

Throughout the term, he will meet with the students to discuss topics relating to intellectual property law, to share their experiences in the work environment, and to participate in a cross-pollination of ideas. We are pleased to welcome our returning placement organizations: Alectra Utilities, AstraZeneca Canada Inc.,

IP 81
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (February 05- February 11)

SpicyIP

Last week we published 9 posts on topics such as our comments on the proposed Trademarks (1st Amendment) Rules, the Madras High Court’s decision with respect to patentability of business methods, and Union Minister of State for Commerce’s response on ability of the current IPR regime to cater concerns arising out of AI generated work.

Trademark 103
article thumbnail

U.S. Supreme Court Vindicates Photographer But Destabilizes Fair Use — Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Barton Beebe’s empirical work on this topic. at 449, Factor 1), and “[i]f the intended use is for commercial gain, th[e] likelihood [of market harm] may be presumed.” ( Id. Before 2020, the Supreme Court decided only four fair use cases. In the first, Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. , at 451, Factor 4).

article thumbnail

Section 1052(c) of the Lanham Act: A First Amendment-Free Zone?

Patently-O

1052(c) provides, in pertinent part, that the PTO must deny federal registration to a trademark if it “[c]onsists of or comprises a name, portrait, or signature identifying a particular individual except by his written consent….” Patent and Trademark Office interprets this to mean no, never, no matter what. 2294 (2019). [8] 9] 447 U.S.