Remove topics inventors
article thumbnail

CAFC ‘Unambiguously’ Backs USPTO in AI as Inventor Fight

IP Watchdog

Vidal that an artificial intelligence (AI) machine does not qualify as an inventor under the Patent Act. The decision is the latest in a series of rulings around the world considering the topic, most of which have found similarly. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) ruled today in Thaler v.

Inventor 134
article thumbnail

Blow to AI, Clarity for Humans: Key Insights from the DABUS Rulings

IP Watchdog

The August 2019 announcement that two patent applications had been filed naming an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm as an inventor in the United States and a dozen other countries was regarded as disruptive and profound at the time. It was one of the hot topics in patent law during those last few months before the pandemic.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Artificial intelligence is not breaking patent law: EPO publishes DABUS decision (J 8/20)

The IPKat

The EPO Board of Appeal has published its full decision on the question of whether a machine can be an inventor ( J 8/20 ). The Board of Appeal had previously announced its decision to refuse two European patent applications naming an algorithm ("DABUS") as the sole inventor at the end of last year ( IPKat ).

article thumbnail

Only Humans are Inventive?

Patently-O

Patent Act was amended in 2011 to expressly require that inventors be “individuals.” In its newest decision on the topic, the Federal Circuit declares instead, for the purposes of patent law, an inventor must be human. But, Thaler refused to claim credit as the inventor. 35 U.S.C. § 100(f) (2022).

Invention 100
article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Rules on Inventor-as-Lexicographer Definitions and the Proper Scope of Reply and Sur-Reply Briefing Following Patent Owner Responses to IPR Institution Decisions

JD Supra Law

Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for IP and USPTO Director No. 2022-1548, (Fed.

article thumbnail

Patent – a shield for modern biotechnology

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

The topic of interest is related to both the cellular and molecular aspects of biological objects. Thus, a legal safeguard should be provided to inventors for their inventions to keep their interest in science alive. Inventors can seek protection from their creations to the government to prevent the infringement of their ideas.

Patent 92
article thumbnail

Examining the Specification

Patently-O

Ariad -Style Written Description : Originally filed claims may also lack written description if the four-corners of the specification fail to show the inventor was in possession. Best-Mode : The original specification must disclose the best mode for carrying out the invention–if one is known by the inventors.

Inventor 105