topics multi-jurisdictional-litigation 
Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts
NOVEMBER 3, 2021
Fish & Richardson is pleased to announce that Principal Lauren Degnan has been named a 2021 “Litigation Trailblazer” by the National Law Journal. A well-known thought leader, Degnan speaks frequently on the topics of patent litigation and PTAB appeals. The managing principal of Fish’s Washington, D.C.,
Trading Secrets
DECEMBER 21, 2021
It is only by keeping up with the newest laws and court pronouncements that litigants can hope to prevail in this ever-changing landscape. Legislation such as anti-SLAPP laws can have a dramatic impact on a litigant’s ability to bring or defend a claim. Employee Termination & Data Repatriation in the Remote Work Environment.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LexBlog IP
DECEMBER 21, 2021
It is only by keeping up with the newest laws and court pronouncements that litigants can hope to prevail in this ever-changing landscape. Legislation such as anti-SLAPP laws can have a dramatic impact on a litigant’s ability to bring or defend a claim. Employee Termination & Data Repatriation in the Remote Work Environment.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
APRIL 1, 2023
So this post is 100% true, even if it might sound farcical. * * * This ruling is part of an ongoing multi-iteration tussle (in and out of court) over market share between two rival unions. This ruling covers two key topics related to 512. Universal * 512(f) Claim Dismissed on Jurisdictional Grounds–Project DoD v.
The IPKat
JULY 5, 2021
The panel was packed with diverse expertise and included representatives of patent owners and implementers as well as lawyers from various jurisdictions, an academic and a former judge. The two questions referred were multi-faceted and can be read in full here (PDF). The settlement means these questions will remain open for now.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
SEPTEMBER 14, 2021
This is a topic I used as a sample exam idea in the 1990s). The litigants use the Internet, but who doesn’t, so normally the court would say this factor is irrelevant. Amazon. * More Evidence Why Keyword Advertising Litigation Is Waning. * Court Dumps Crappy Trademark & Keyword Ad Case–ONEPul v. Marketing channels.
LexBlog IP
JULY 21, 2021
Bond that both disregarded the claim (or the court’s jurisdiction to rule on such a claim) of the supernatural authorship, and recognized the possibility of joint authorship between living humans and a spirit, each of which is a far cry from the U.S. Indeed, she cites there ( in fns. 98-99 ) the 1927 English case of Cummins v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
40 
Let's personalize your content