Remove topics stipulated-judgment
article thumbnail

Supreme Court of China casted punitive damages upon post-settlement-agreement repeated patent infringement

The IPKat

The intentional repeated infringement falls under ‘Other situations where the circumstances may be found to be serious’ as stipulated in Article 4 of the PD Interpretation. For those who are interested in this topic, the chapter might be a fun read. The judgment is not published at the official source.

article thumbnail

Use of large language models in the patent industry: A risk to patent quality?

The IPKat

Lord Justice Birss himself recently made headlines for praising the usefulness of ChatGPT for writing court judgments. LLM are undeniably very good at providing generic text on a topic for which the internet provides extensive guidance, and for which a deep understanding of complex specialist technical issues is not required.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Are Courts Finally Getting Fed Up With Copyright Shakedowns?

Copyright Lately

But unlike most Creative Commons licensors, Philpot stipulates that users must comply with complex and difficult to follow terms of attribution. Judge Trenga didn’t cite Philpot’s checkered history in his recent summary judgment order. Also, I’m looking for future article topics! So, what do you think?

article thumbnail

Does food flavouring constitute a “work”?

LexBlog IP

This judgment concerned the “individuality” of work, which reflects the singularity of its creator’s creative process. For further information on this topic please contact Kriton Metaxopoulos at A & K Metaxopoulos & Partners Law Firm by telephone (+30 210 725 7614) or email ( k.metaxopoulos@metaxopouloslaw.gr ).

article thumbnail

2021 Post-Grant Report

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

Sotera, on leave from the Board, filed a reply to the preliminary response highlighting a broad stipulation “not to pursue in the District Court Litigation any ground raised or that could have been reasonably raised in an IPR.” Petitioner’s stipulation stated that it “will not pursue in this case the specific grounds. [in]

article thumbnail

Court clarifies process for CMO equitable remuneration

LexBlog IP

The judgment also dealt with the presumption of management and protection representative authority for CMOs. This entailed negotiating and collecting judicially and extrajudicially the reasonable and uniform remuneration as stipulated in article 49 (public performance of material carriers of music).

Music 52
article thumbnail

Full Of Sound And Query, Signifying Something: Recent Noise Over Acoustic Trademarks

LexBlog IP

19 The distinctive character of a trade mark must be assessed by reference, first, to the goods or services in respect of which registration is sought and, second, to the perception of the relevant public (see judgment of 12 February 2004, Henkel, C‑218/01, EU:C:2004:88, paragraph 50 and the case-law cited). ” Id.