2003 Contracts Licensing Privacy 
IP and Legal Filings
NOVEMBER 23, 2023
i] In principle, the Delhi High Court has recognized publicity rights in the case of ICC Development (International) Ltd v Arvee Enterprises (2003). [ii] Conclusion As per my analysis, the Indian judiciary has identified these rights as part of the right to Privacy and IPR, but no defined legislation exists that can regulate things.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
MAY 2, 2022
The court remains skeptical of LinkedIn’s privacy-based arguments: LinkedIn has no protected property interest in the data contributed by its users, as the users retain ownership over their profiles. With that said, the Ninth Circuit did some serious hand-waving on the privacy issues.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IIPRD
JANUARY 29, 2023
The issues pertaining to the rights of VTubers encompass rights to the design of the character, the privacy of the individual, licensing and taking inspiration from an existing character. However, the conversation being considered as a contract between them was unclear regarding the IP rights. 6] Stuart D. Levi & Alex B.
The IPKat
AUGUST 29, 2021
Upon that, The IPKat is delighted to host the following guest post co-authored by Anja Geller (PhD candidate at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität and Junior Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition) and Zihao Li (PhD candidate at CREATe, University of Glasgow, on privacy and data protection in the Chinese Civil Code).
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JANUARY 24, 2023
It also puts users’ privacy and security (including minors’!) Moody, amicus brief in support of the petition for certiorari , November 2022 Comments to the CPPA’s Proposed Regulations Pursuant to the Consumer Privacy Rights Act of 2020, California Privacy Protection Agency, August 2022 NetChoice LLC v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
95 
Let's personalize your content