2004 Copyright Fair Use Marketing 
43(B)log
MARCH 1, 2022
He sued; the court of appeals affirms a finding of fair use on a motion to dismiss and an award of attorneys’ fees. Bell continues to market his 1982 72-page book, and also sells merchandise, “including t-shirts and posters that display the passage that was quoted in the tweets.” Effect on the market: Harm was implausible.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
AUGUST 2, 2021
Some of the major changes to the book this year: I added a note on the Copyright Claims Board. Primer on the Copyright Claims Board (CCB). Copyright Basics (Copyright Office Circular 1). Note About Fair Use. Note on the Copyright Claims Board (CCB). Weis Markets. Primer on CCPA/CPRA.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright Lately
MAY 17, 2021
Parody is tricky, both as an art form and as a matter of copyright law. And putting aside its pure entertainment value, the sketch also raises some interesting questions about just how much of an original work may be taken before parodic fair use crosses the line into copyright infringement. Did SNL go too far?
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
DECEMBER 15, 2021
A refresher: in 1998, Congress created a notice-and-takedown scheme for user-submitted items that allegedly infringe copyright. Copyright owners send takedown notices, and service providers either remove the items or lose the safe harbor. The DMCA’s main counterbalance to copyright owner overreach was supposed to be 512(f).
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JULY 12, 2022
Primer on the Copyright Claims Board (CCB) (now deleted). Copyright Basics (Copyright Office Circular 1). Note About Fair Use. The post Announcing the 2022 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. I posted the 2022 version, so it’s as fresh as it gets.
43(B)log
AUGUST 4, 2021
Jacob Victor, Copyright’s Law of Dissemination: trying to disaggregate dissemination from use of a work in new creativity/e.g., transformative fair use. Judicial: Google Books/utility expanding fair use; Sony v. 2)-(4) are all within the conventional incentives/access tradeoff lens.
LexBlog IP
SEPTEMBER 29, 2022
They are marketed through different, yet related, channels of trade (sports and entertainment, which were melded together as ESPN’s original name ). 1 v OHIM , C‑329/02 P, EU:C:2004:532, paragraph 23). In the US, other sound marks include Law & Order ’s ca-chung chung (as Reg. As noted (at 498, fn.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
90 
Let's personalize your content