Technology & Marketing Law Blog

AUGUST 2, 2021

Some of the major changes to the book this year: I added a note on the Copyright Claims Board. I’ve now framed it as a note about California’s consumer privacy laws. Primer on the Copyright Claims Board (CCB). Copyright Basics (Copyright Office Circular 1). Note on the Copyright Claims Board (CCB).

Editing 145

Editing Law Privacy Contracts 145

IP and Legal Filings

NOVEMBER 23, 2023

Publicity, such as character, reputation and personal brand, will be protected under various statutes, such as the Copyright Act 1957 and the Trade Marks Act 1999. Conclusion As per my analysis, the Indian judiciary has identified these rights as part of the right to Privacy and IPR, but no defined legislation exists that can regulate things.

Intellectual Property 96

Intellectual Property Privacy Branding Brands 96

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JULY 12, 2022

Primer on the Copyright Claims Board (CCB) (now deleted). Copyright Basics (Copyright Office Circular 1). Part 312, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act’s Regulations. s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and State Consumer Privacy Laws. I posted the 2022 version, so it’s as fresh as it gets.

Editing 140

Editing Law Social Media Privacy 140

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JANUARY 18, 2024

However, those arguments were more theoretical than empirical; there weren’t a lot of high-profile examples of a mass-market consumer service deploying this strategy. Despite these obvious issues, the privacy community has been conspicuously quiet about age authentication. Musk has bridged that gap.

Law 103

Law Social Media Advertising Advertising 103

IIPRD

FEBRUARY 23, 2021

Intellectual Property such as patents, trademarks, brand value, copyright, etc have become foundational assets for several businesses, seeking greater importance and attention. The risks include unauthorised use and infringement, technological obsolescence, and the marketable nature of IP as collateral. Objective 5.11.1

IP 40

IP Intellectual Property Branding Brands 40

SpicyIP

JULY 19, 2021

Adyasha notes that while the Copyright Act deems the producer of a film as its author, that doesn’t imply that author and copyright owner would necessarily remain the same perpetually. She criticises the judgment because the Court based its reasoning solely on privacy without any justifications rooted in property rights.

Advertising 105

Advertising Advertising Non-Fungible Tokens Intellectual Property 105

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

SEPTEMBER 14, 2021

There’s also a copyright claim for Luxy copying the plaintiff’s TOS/privacy policy. The court recounts the perennially problematic Brookfield case and how the 2004 Playboy v. Marketing channels. Luxy appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. ” (How about this: let’s not).

Advertising 99

Advertising Advertising Trademark Settlement 99