Technology & Marketing Law Blog
AUGUST 2, 2021
I’ve now framed it as a note about California’s consumer privacy laws. Trademarks and Domain Names. Trademark FAQs. Trademark Glossary. Review: Google’s Trademark Policy [[link]. Part 312, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act’s Regulations. I added a major note on the Van Buren v.
IP and Legal Filings
NOVEMBER 23, 2023
iii] Provisions in Indians Laws Trademarks Act, 1999 does not make any exact provision for publicity rights, but its definition of ‘Marks’ contains names within its ambit. ii] 2003 VIIAD Delhi 405, 2003 (26) PTC 245 Del, 2004 (1) RAJ 10 [iii] The Trademarks Act, 1999. [iv] iv] The Copyrights Act, 1957. [v]
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JULY 12, 2022
Trademarks and Domain Names. Trademark FAQs. Trademark Glossary. Review: Google’s Trademark Policy [[link]. Part 312, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act’s Regulations. s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and State Consumer Privacy Laws. Section 512(c) Cheat Sheet. Shelter Capital (9th Cir.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JANUARY 18, 2024
In particular, age authentication mandates are riddled with unavoidable privacy and security concerns; they also make it harder to navigate the Internet and create an authentication infrastructure that censors and authoritarians will find easy to weaponize in the future.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
SEPTEMBER 14, 2021
But trademark plaintiffs and judges are still partying like it’s 1999. Defendant has also used Plaintiffs’ trademarks “Seeking Millionaire,” “Seeking Arrangement,” “Whats Your Price,” “Carrot Dating,” and “Seeking” as search terms in the Apple Appstore and Google Play Store to yield LuxyApp as a search result.
SpicyIP
JULY 19, 2021
Nishtha emphasises that in determining whether the deceased possessed personality rights enforceable by his heirs, the Court based its reasoning on the intertwining between privacy and publicity rights. She criticises the judgment because the Court based its reasoning solely on privacy without any justifications rooted in property rights.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JANUARY 24, 2023
It also puts users’ privacy and security (including minors’!) A bill that sought to accelerate the demise of online marketplaces by creating a new and unmanageable species of contributory trademark liability. It also necessitates that users must reveal highly sensitive personal information before they can access a service.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
145 
Let's personalize your content