article thumbnail

Design Patent Obviousness Inquiry Is Up for Review at the CAFC

JD Supra Law

GM Global Technology to rule on the issue of whether the current test for determining obviousness of design patents, i.e., the Rosen/Durling Standard, is proper in view of the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in KSR v. 398 (2007), which significantly broadened the obviousness inquiry for utility. Teleflex, 550 U.S.

article thumbnail

Infographic | Beer glass design patents

Olartemoure Blog

Design patents allow breweries to safeguard these elements of aesthetic distinction, securing exclusive rights to their innovative designs. Some examples of beer glasses design patents in the US: BEER GLASS US D954,504 S Inventors: Nicolas Brouillac Assignee: PEUGEOT SAVEURS Date of Patent: Jun. Date of Patent: Feb.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Obviousness Test for Design Patents Unchanged

The IP Law Blog

Design patents and utility patents are two different things. Design patents protect ornamental designs, such as the shape of a perfume bottle or the design on flatware. To be patentable, however, both designs and functional inventions must satisfy two requirements. First, they must be novel (i.e., Telflex, Inc.,

article thumbnail

Uncertainty Ahead if Design Patent Obviousness Test is Abrogated by en banc CAFC

JD Supra Law

In a surprising move, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) has granted a petition for rehearing en banc on the issue of whether the test for determining obviousness of design patents has been overruled by the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in KSR v. 398 (2007). Teleflex, 550 U.S. In the case, captioned LKQ Corp.

article thumbnail

Federal Circuit to Revisit Whether KSR Extends to Design Patents

JD Supra Law

Granting a petition for rehearing en banc, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided to revisit the effect of the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in KSR International v. Teleflex on design patents. The Federal Circuit withdrew its earlier panel decision addressing KSR’s application to design patents. 21-2348 (Fed.

article thumbnail

Full Federal Circuit Set to Consider Changing the Test for Obviousness of Design Patents

JD Supra Law

Last week, the Federal Circuit decided to consider, en banc, whether the Supreme Court’s 2007 KSR decision regarding obviousness overruled the Federal Circuit’s decades-old Rosen and Durling tests for design patents, setting in motion a potential lowering of the bar for obviousness.

article thumbnail

Rosen Set Table For Design Patent Obviousness, LKQ Might Clear It

JD Supra Law

Big changes to design patent invalidity law may be coming. 398, 419 (2007). A pending IPR appeal challenges the Federal Circuit’s 40-year-old obviousness formula as inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s rejection of “a rigid rule that limits the obviousness inquiry” in KSR v. Teleflex, 550 U.S.