Remove 2010 Remove Contracts Remove Fair Use Remove Marketing
article thumbnail

Facebook Faces Contributory Trademark Liability for Marketplace Listings–Car-Freshner v. Meta

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The court summarizes: “Meta claims that it raised issues with Plaintiffs, including “nominative fair use,” “commentary,” and “the un-likelihood of confusion based on the appearance of the marks in the actual marketplace, as they will be encountered by consumers.”” Meta Platforms, Inc.

article thumbnail

If “Trespass to Chattels” Isn’t Limited to “Chattels,” Anarchy Ensues–Best Carpet Values v. Google

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Nevertheless, because adware often provided poor consumer experiences, adware largely fizzled out by 2010. The court approaches this case like it’s an adware case, but the court never once uses the term. Implied-in-Law Contract/Unjust Enrichment. WhenU concluded that copyright was a dead-end. 1-800 Contacts v. Intel Corp.,

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

IPSC Panel 5 – Copyright, Distribution, and Access

43(B)log

Jacob Victor, Copyright’s Law of Dissemination: trying to disaggregate dissemination from use of a work in new creativity/e.g., transformative fair use. Judicial: Google Books/utility expanding fair use; Sony v. Contracts should not be permitted to override exceptions and limitations.

article thumbnail

IPSC breakout session 2: Int'l IP. TM, Antitrust

43(B)log

Around 2010, some studios started enforcing, e.g., Twentieth Century Fox sued over copying of plot of Phone Booth and was successful. But there was pressure from the market: this is a business trying to make money. One company does the market research and the other follows.

IP 72
article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

SpicyIP

The Court interpreted the clause on ownership of work made during a contract of service (Section 17(c)) to not apply in situations where there is a contract between equals. The Court limited the scope of Section 17(c) to apply to contracts where the relationship between the parties is akin to that of an apprenticeship.

IP 124
article thumbnail

2021 Internet Law Year-in-Review

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The first Supreme Court ruling on fair use in over a quarter-century, and it’s a good one. The Crisis of Online Contracts (as Told in 10 Memes) , Notre Dame J. Previous year-in-review lists from 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 , 2009 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006. Emerging Tech.

article thumbnail

2022 Internet Law Year-in-Review

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Two recent key developments were the Digital Markets Act and the Digital Services Act. This discourages visits to new sites, which will reward incumbents and thwart new market entrants. And yet…a #MAGA Ohio judge sealioned his rejection of Google’s motion to dismiss. at greater risk. 18, 2022 NetChoice LLC v.

Law 113