article thumbnail

Facebook Faces Contributory Trademark Liability for Marketplace Listings–Car-Freshner v. Meta

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The court summarizes: “Meta claims that it raised issues with Plaintiffs, including “nominative fair use,” “commentary,” and “the un-likelihood of confusion based on the appearance of the marks in the actual marketplace, as they will be encountered by consumers.””

article thumbnail

[Guest Post] Long walk to copyright reform #9: The Copyright Amendment Bill ensures fair remuneration for South African creators and performers

The IPKat

The disproportionate remuneration stemmed from contracts entered into with dominant players, especially in the music industry, and this has over time been a major source of worry for the South African government. The MITT and CRC found the Copyright Act to be inadequate in addressing the issues.

Copyright 132
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Pairing Successful: Trademark Agreement And Its Compliance

IP and Legal Filings

As FCA had never executed the Agreement, the court refused to enforce a forum selection clause of a contract that did not exist. Turning to FCA’s nominative and fair use defence, the court applied the New Kids on the Block test to evaluate likelihood of confusion.

article thumbnail

IPSC Panel 5 – Copyright, Distribution, and Access

43(B)log

Jacob Victor, Copyright’s Law of Dissemination: trying to disaggregate dissemination from use of a work in new creativity/e.g., transformative fair use. Judicial: Google Books/utility expanding fair use; Sony v. Contracts should not be permitted to override exceptions and limitations.

article thumbnail

If “Trespass to Chattels” Isn’t Limited to “Chattels,” Anarchy Ensues–Best Carpet Values v. Google

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Nevertheless, because adware often provided poor consumer experiences, adware largely fizzled out by 2010. The court approaches this case like it’s an adware case, but the court never once uses the term. Implied-in-Law Contract/Unjust Enrichment. WhenU concluded that copyright was a dead-end. 1-800 Contacts v. Intel Corp.,

article thumbnail

IPSC breakout session 2: Int'l IP. TM, Antitrust

43(B)log

Around 2010, some studios started enforcing, e.g., Twentieth Century Fox sued over copying of plot of Phone Booth and was successful. Our notions of contract/markets out of which the current rules arise are themselves influenced by androcentric notions. But there weren’t reported lawsuits against Bollywood films.

IP 72
article thumbnail

2021 Internet Law Year-in-Review

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The first Supreme Court ruling on fair use in over a quarter-century, and it’s a good one. The Crisis of Online Contracts (as Told in 10 Memes) , Notre Dame J. Previous year-in-review lists from 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 , 2009 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006. Emerging Tech.