article thumbnail

En Banc: When Employees Leave with a Half-Baked Invention

Patently-O

Some months later, after leaving and forming 10X, they completed the inventions and filed patent applications. Bio-Rad now argues that it has partial ownership rights to the inventions based upon the inventor’s contributions while employees. Pre-Invention Innovations Not Captured by Employment Agreement Duty to Assign.

article thumbnail

The Quest for a Meaningful Threshold of Invention: Atlantic Works v. Brady (1883)

Patently-O

The Supreme Court ultimately reversed the lower court’s decision upholding the patent and found instead that Brady’s claimed invention lacked novelty and did not constitute a patentable advance over the prior art. Such inventors are worthy of all favor. Brady for an improved dredge boat design. 63, 67 (2020).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Guest Post: DABUS Gains Traction: South Africa Becomes First Country to Recognize AI-Invented Patent

Patently-O

A world first – South Africa recently made headlines by granting a patent for ‘a food container based on fractal geometry’ to a non-human inventor, namely an artificial intelligence (AI) machine called DABUS. Guest Post by Meshandren Naidoo and Dr. Christian E.

Invention 128
article thumbnail

Examining the Specification

Patently-O

In particular, the original specification must show ‘possession’ of the newly claimed invention. 132(a) (“No amendment shall introduce new matter into the disclosure of the invention.”). 2010) (en banc). During prosecution, this is also captured under 35 U.S.C. Eli Lilly and Company , 598 F.3d

Inventor 105
article thumbnail

Searching for Claim Support in a Patent Specification? You Better Blaze a Trail

LexBlog IP

In its IPR petition, Gilead submitted that a prior art reference (Sofia), published in 2010, anticipated the claims. 2010) (en banc). To be granted that right, the patentee must also sufficiently describe the invention and its context within the art to demonstrate his possession of the inventive concept.

Patent 52
article thumbnail

Authenticating Prior Art

Patently-O

Ironburg Inventions ( Fed. Valve submitted a printout of Burns and argues that it was a printed copy of an online review of a Scuf controller from 2010. In particular, one of the inventors (Burgess) testified that he had facilitated the publication back in 2010 for marketing purposes. by Dennis Crouch. Valve Corp.

Art 124
article thumbnail

The Analogous Art Doctrine Post-KSR: Insights from the Federal Circuit’s Daedalus Decision

Patently-O

The law of analogous art is a critical concept in determining the obviousness of an invention under 35 U.S.C. § Even if a reference qualifies as prior art under Section 102, it can only be relied upon for an obviousness rejection if it is considered “analogous” to the invention at issue. In re Bigio , 381 F.3d 3d 1320 (Fed.

Art 68