article thumbnail

All Inventors are Human; All Humans are Inventors

Patently-O

Vidal ask the Supreme Court one simple question: Does the Patent Act categorically restrict the statutory term ‘inventor’ to human beings alone? The basic idea here is that we have a public policy goal of encouraging innovation and invention, “promot[ing] the Progress of Science and useful Arts.” In the U.S.,

Inventor 122
article thumbnail

Alleged Co-Inventor Not Bringing Home the Bacon This Time

The IP Law Blog

Well, it turns out that not all contributions count when it comes to being an inventor of a patent for a better method of precooking bacon. Unitherm”), argued that it had rights to the patent because its president was an inventor and should be added to the patent. Also, Howard was not named as an inventor. The court in Pannu v.

Inventor 110
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Alleged Co-Inventor Not Bringing Home the Bacon This Time

LexBlog IP

Well, it turns out that not all contributions count when it comes to being an inventor of a patent for a better method of precooking bacon. HIP, formerly Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. (“Unitherm”), argued that it had rights to the patent because its president was an inventor and should be added to the patent. Iolab Corp.

article thumbnail

Prior Art as of the Effective Filing Date

Patently-O

RapidPulse decision in that provides important guidance on the use of a provisional patent application’s filing date for 102(a)(2) prior art under the America Invents Act. 102(a)(2) is a bit clunky, but its effect is to codify the first-to-file regime created by the America Invents Act of 2011. . = = = The language of 35 U.S.C.

Art 49
article thumbnail

Examining the Specification

Patently-O

Ariad -Style Written Description : Originally filed claims may also lack written description if the four-corners of the specification fail to show the inventor was in possession. Enablement : The original specification must enable a person of skill in the art to make and use the invention without undue experimentation.

Inventor 105
article thumbnail

Conference Posters and Materials: Beware! They Can Constitute Prior Art

Canadian Intellectual Property Blog

The subject matter of a patent claim must not have been previously disclosed, and the invention must not be obvious to a person skilled in the art or science to which it pertains [1]. The poster, together with information found in other sources of prior art, were enough to find the patent claims in question obvious and invalid.

Art 52
article thumbnail

EPO consults on patent grace periods (again)

The IPKat

The EPC as it currently stands does not permit a grace period in which inventors may disclose their invention without prejudicing a future patent filing. If the inventor has disclosed their invention during the grace period, then further disclosures by third parties also don't constitute prior art ( AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1)(A) ).

Patent 131