Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JULY 25, 2021
Aliign “is an event, lifestyle, and apparel company” allegedly with a first trademark use in 2011. Since 2014, they have sold a total of 7 units of apparel (5 of which were bought by the CEO’s friends). More Posts About Keyword Advertising. Ohio Bans Competitive Keyword Advertising by Lawyers.
Erik K Pelton
DECEMBER 20, 2022
On November 7 th , Conde Nast sued Drake and 21 Savage for $4 million for false advertising and infringing Vogue’s trademarks. Pelton & Associates ®, a boutique trademark law firm in Falls Church, Virginia. trademarks for clients and has represented hundreds of parties in trademark disputes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
43(B)log
MAY 22, 2023
May 19, 2023) Whereas the timeshare false advertising cases might be making law largely applicable to other timeshare cases, what’s going on in the strip club advertising cases might have somewhat broader implications. Several had appeared in magazines, advertising campaigns, television episodes, and films. 21-2149-cv, F.4th
IP and Legal Filings
JANUARY 26, 2023
He was unmistakably aware of the nuances regarding colours in trademark law. Broadly speaking, trademarks are of two types: traditional and non-traditional. [1] Notwithstanding the essence of this finding, this is too narrow an interpretation of the true spirit of trademark law. 214, 229 (2018).
43(B)log
DECEMBER 1, 2022
Chesney also performed on the Lounge’s beachfront stage at a 2014 concert broadcast as “Kenny Chesney: Live at the Flora-Bama” on Country Music Television (CMT), a Viacom channel. This justification is at least consistent with the core idea of trademark law. Moviegoers should be able to identify the movie they want to see.
SpicyIP
NOVEMBER 23, 2021
We are pleased to bring you a guest post from Payal Saraogi, on a recent decision of the Delhi High Court on Google’s use of trademarks as advertisement keywords. Payal has graduated from the School of Law, Christ University in 2020, and currently practices as a disputes lawyer. Confusion caused by Google’s keyword policy.
43(B)log
DECEMBER 20, 2022
Plaintiffs also alleged infringement of Monbo’s right of publicity, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Lanham Act and related Maryland trademark law. Lanham Act claims based on common-law rights were barred by laches. Twelve” was insufficient because there was no allegation plaintiffs had a valid trademark in that world.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
105 
Let's personalize your content