2014 Contracts Litigation Patent Infringement 
IP Watchdog
JANUARY 3, 2024
holding that the language of the governing contract's forum selection clause expressly allowed for the filing of inter partes review (IPR) proceedings in certain circumstances. entered into a settlement and license agreement in 2014, following years of patent litigation over their competing glucose monitoring system patents.
The IPKat
SEPTEMBER 23, 2022
The winds of a busy Belgian court term blows through the IPKat's wild ancestor's mane (c) Christopher Stothers 'Tis the season for a look at the cases that were in 2021 from around Europe and what they mean for the IP litigation themes in those jurisdictions now that the dust has settled in 2022. The decisions we (arbitrarily!)
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently-O
SEPTEMBER 13, 2021
The decision is significant as it is the first by the Fifth Circuit to address the licensing of standards-essential patents and the meaning of “fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory” (FRAND) licensing terms, adding to the growing body of jurisprudence already issued by the Third, Ninth and Federal Circuits in this area. 2014), Microsoft v.
Trading Secrets
JANUARY 19, 2022
In April 2014 Foro contacted Vita through the generic contact form on Vita’s website to discuss building a deployment wheel for Foro’s laser, which it marketed as a multiconductor cutting tool. On July 29, 2014, the Parties executed a mutual Nondisclosure and Restricted Use Agreement (the “NDA”). Foro Energy, Inc. Code §§ 134A.001
LexBlog IP
AUGUST 31, 2021
The decision also found that HTC’s proposed FRAND jury instructions were not a substantially correct statement of the law, because Ericsson’s ETSI FRAND commitment was governed by French contract law, but HTC’s instructions were based on U.S. law without reference or comparison to French contract law.
Patently-O
FEBRUARY 22, 2023
Stroud is General Counsel at Unified Patents – an organization often adverse to litigation-funded entities. [1] Patent assertion finance today is a multibillion-dollar business. [2] 2] Virtually nonexistent in the patent space in the U.S. Patent assertion finance today is a multibillion-dollar business. [2]
Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts
DECEMBER 2, 2020
The absence of a well-developed body of formal prior art raises the danger that the USPTO will issue invalid or overly broad patents due to very limited information or proof of prior use. Patent Litigation. The landscape surrounding cannabis patent litigation is uncertain at best. 208 (2014).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
57 
Let's personalize your content