2014 Litigation Patent Infringement Patent Law 
Patently-O
FEBRUARY 24, 2022
Qualcomm had previously sued Apple for patent infringement, and Apple responded with a set of inter partes review petitions. The parties settled the litigation before the IPRs were complete, but agreed that the IPRs could continue. The settlement also included a license to thousands of Qualcomm patents.
The IP Law Blog
MAY 7, 2021
285, determining plaintiff’s litigation positions were not baseless even after a granting of summary judgment of noninfringement that “was not a close call.” . As way of background, in patent infringement cases, Courts are authorized to award “reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party” in “exceptional cases.”
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently-O
JULY 8, 2022
David Tropp sued Travel Sentry for patent infringement back in 2006. That was the same year that I first taught a patent law class. Back then, eligibility was almost an unknown concept in patent litigation. 208 (2014). 101, as interpreted in Alice Corp Pty v. CLS Bank Int’l , 573 U.S.
Patently-O
SEPTEMBER 13, 2021
The decision is significant as it is the first by the Fifth Circuit to address the licensing of standards-essential patents and the meaning of “fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory” (FRAND) licensing terms, adding to the growing body of jurisprudence already issued by the Third, Ninth and Federal Circuits in this area. 2014), Microsoft v.
The IP Law Blog
NOVEMBER 3, 2022
and the wealthy countries, Moderna announced that it expected its competitors to respect Moderna’s intellectual property and that it would offer patent licenses on reasonable terms to those who asked. On August 26, 2022, Moderna sued Pfizer and BioNTech for patent infringement in the district court in Massachusetts.
LexBlog IP
AUGUST 31, 2021
Ericsson and HTC had entered cross-license agreements in 2003, 2008 and 2014. Under the 2014 license agreement, HTC paid Ericsson a lump sum of $75 million regardless of HTC’s phone sales, which effectively was $2.50 In 2016, just before the 2014 license expired, HTC and Ericsson began negotiating renewal of the license. .”
Patently-O
MARCH 18, 2024
The Patent Act includes a 6-year statute of limitations, but as written it only applies to cut-off recovery for patent infringement — and does not apply to lawsuits to correct inventorship. This ruling aligned patent law with the Court’s prior decision in Petrella v. 663 (2014).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
95 
Let's personalize your content