article thumbnail

Retailer has standing to assert Lanham Act false advertising claims against its own supplier

43(B)log

SA-22-CV-00096-XR, 2022 WL 17086368 (W.D. 18, 2022) Lexmark provides standing to a purchaser because the harms it alleged are “commercial” harms. In summer 2020, AHBP began negotiating with the Lynd defendants for the exclusive license to market and sell a surface disinfectant/cleaner known as “Bioprotect 500” in Argentina.

article thumbnail

alleged misrepresentation of partnership/approval suffices for false advertising claim

43(B)log

8, 2023) When does TM logic creep into false advertising cases? Tundra allegedly uses the information it scrapes from Faire’s platform, including contact information, to market its product. Faire Wholesale, Inc. Tundra, Inc., 2023 WL 8586681, No. 23-cv-02538-JSC (N.D. Faire sued Tundra, which makes a comparison tool.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Monster wins permanent injunction against VPX in false advertising case

43(B)log

12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on false advertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in false advertising cases. Are lost prospective customers and market share purely economic harms? So too with lost market share. and] expects to complete.

article thumbnail

Falsely advertising "ghost guns" as legal in NY is actionable

43(B)log

Lawmakers in New York City and New York State banned the sale of unfinished frames and receivers in 2020 and 2022, respectively. Defendants contended that marketing unfinished frames and receivers as “legal” was protected by the First Amendment. First, the marketing was commercial speech: “NO FFL Required!” It was not.

article thumbnail

Noncommercial speakers can be liable for contributory false advertising

43(B)log

Pacifici, 2022 WL 889275, No. 25, 2022) I know it probably seems sometimes like I approve of every expansive use of false advertising law, but sometimes even I find an aggressive position to go too far. This was first used by VSL, marketed as VSL#3. ExeGi Pharma, LLC v. 1:21-CV-2134-TWT (N.D.

article thumbnail

Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute False Advertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet v. Troia

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

So by the time the court says “the parties are vying for users in the same ‘market,'” you know that the judge has lost the thread. How can Troia vie for a “market” when the court already said he “is not offering a good or service”??? Troia , 2022 WL 3544170 (S.D.N.Y. Reyes & Adler v.

article thumbnail

how can one show false advertising injury to get a presumption of irreparable harm?

43(B)log

8:22-cv-827-JVS-KESx, 2022 WL 18396275 (C.D. 12, 2022) Reconsidering its previous decision as to the Lanham Act claim , the court granted a preliminary injunction against counterclaim defendant Santos dba OSD. Santos Elecs. Outlaw Audio, LLC, No. Injury requires evidence of causality and consumer deception.