TorrentFreak

NOVEMBER 30, 2022

Hollywood believes that these ‘cam’ copies cause significant damage to the cinema industry, an opinion shared by the UK’s Film Distributors’ Association. Sources confirm that the copies were traced back to two multi-screen cinemas, both of them in Liverpool, the location mentioned by PIPCU.

Cinema 126

Cinema Intellectual Property Copying Government 126

SpicyIP

NOVEMBER 15, 2022

SpicyIP Tidbits: Compulsory License on Mira Behn’s Autobiography, and Stricter Test of Similarity of Marks for Medicinal Products. The High Court also noted that merely because the impugned mark’s advertisement occurred in Delhi, the courts of Delhi will not become eligible to adjudicate on the dispute. Image from here.

Trademark 105

Trademark Patent Copyright Designs 105

Copyright Lately

OCTOBER 25, 2021

As the story goes, they provided him with a copy of a few scenes from “Ghostbusters” in which the theme would appear. You can judge for yourself by downloading a copy of “Jap Herron” here. The case is New Line Cinema v. Cinema Secrets (2000). to write the’s film’s signature song.

Copyright 144

Copyright Cinema Copying Copyright Infringement 144

TorrentFreak

JULY 6, 2023

As a result, Russia no longer feels bound by licensing restrictions and will source the same content from elsewhere, whenever that’s required. 46-FZ that would allow Western content with exclusive foreign rights to be translated, reproduced/copied and publicly distributed with zero permission needed from the rightsholders.

Intellectual Property 112

Intellectual Property Cinema Reporting Licensing 112

TorrentFreak

NOVEMBER 27, 2021

“In terms of our client’s loss, our client’s film was originally planned to be released in cinemas in the first quarter of 2020. Their reasoning was that they were unlikely to recoup the cost of advertising the film and renting theatres when the film was available for free online and, therefore, would lose money.”

Copying 139

Copying Settlement Cinema Copyright 139

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

This will potentially impact the copyright licensing landscape insofar as filmmakers will have to enter into dedicated agreements to claim protection for works not listed within the scope of Section 17. Microsoft Technology Licensing v. the licensee. The judgement was authored by Justice C. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (PUBL) v.

IP 124

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 124