Advertising Copying Licensing Settlement 
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
AUGUST 30, 2023
This is a competitive keyword advertising lawsuit. This is fine, but it deviates from courts’ efforts over the years to come up with multi-factor variations specific to keyword advertising. ” But the advertiser was engaging in comparative advertising, which I think also strongly serves the public interest.
43(B)log
AUGUST 22, 2022
18, 2022) Not bound by Article III, the California Supreme Court issued a ruling despite the parties’ settlement. The statements were “commercial advertising meant to sell a product, and generally there ‘can be no constitutional objection to the suppression of commercial messages that do not accurately inform the public.’”
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
BYU Copyright Blog
OCTOBER 17, 2022
In the Complaint, Bowers argues that the Defendants “took Plaintiff’s copyrighted Work without a proper license in order to nationally advertise, market, and promote its business activities across the Kansas City, Missouri area.” The use of the Work on the College's graphic design department website was allegedly discovered in 2019.Bowers
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
FEBRUARY 12, 2024
In 2013, Philpot uploaded the photo to Wikimedia Commons, which is governed by the standard Creative Commons license requiring attribution. Philpot claims his standard photo licensing fee is $3,500, but reuses of the photo from Wikipedia Commons didn’t require any payment (just attribution). Nature of the Work. Amount Taken.
43(B)log
FEBRUARY 24, 2021
I always enjoy these and recommend the free GALA webinars to those interested in advertising law; I joined in progress due to some technical difficulties on my end. Teami ($15 million settlement, all but $1 million suspended), where there were other bad things like fighting cancer claims and also nondisclosure by influencers like Cardi B.
TorrentFreak
JANUARY 11, 2022
Initially, the parties entered settlement discussions. According to Bungie, AimJunkies copied and distributed its copyrighted work, to develop and advertise its cheat software. The cheat software itself certainly isn’t a copy of Bungie’s work, they add. . Copyright Questions.
43(B)log
MARCH 1, 2022
Bell allegedly offers licenses for its use. Amount/substantiality: Accepting his allegation that the passage was the heart of the work, the court saw no need to separately address his argument that the separate registration meant that the school district copied the “whole” work. NXIVM Corp. Ross Institute, 364 F.3d 3d 471 (2d Cir.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
85 
Let's personalize your content