article thumbnail

Art kerfuffle of the day

43(B)log

Little did I expect I'd wake up to mainstream newspapers trying to provoke another chapter of the art war, to promote his art show at the Venice Biennale. I want *everyone to be able to have it if they like, because art should be for everyone! After years and years in the making. Does his work above look familiar?

Art 59
article thumbnail

Building an Amazing Digital Art Portfolio that Lands Jobs

Art Law Journal

Compiling a professional digital art portfolio of your work is a vital part of marketing yourself as a creative and landing jobs for artists. Whether you’re looking to secure a spot in an art school, land an art-related job, or vying to get a show at a gallery, the quality and effectiveness of your portfolio presentation are essential.

Art 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

No Fair Use for Warhol Prince Photo

LexBlog IP

Art Law in Session To illustrate, Vanity Fair paid the Andy Warhol Foundation $10,000 to use his work (which borrowed significantly from Goldsmith’s photo), while People paid Goldsmith $1,000 for her image. He gained notoriety because of how close he walked the line between outright plagiarism and transformative art.

article thumbnail

Copyright for Architectural Designs

Art Law Journal

At that time, anyone could reproduce buildings that looked identical to those created by others, as long as they didn’t actually use copied drawings to build them. The post Copyright for Architectural Designs appeared first on Art Business Journal. With the passage […].

Designs 52
article thumbnail

Who Owns Works Created by a Freelancer?

Art Law Journal

Nobody can copy, distribute, or display the work without the author’s permission. appeared first on Art Business Journal. As a general rule, when an artistic or literary work is created, the author is the one that holds the copyright. The post Who Owns Works Created by a Freelancer?

article thumbnail

court finds that transferring title to mural also transferred (c); VARA and CMI claims against ad also fail

43(B)log

Williams wasn’t entitled to a rebuttable presumption that he was the copyright owner because he only submitted a copy of his Public Catalog search results, not his certificate of registration. The court found that the only reasonable interpretation of the contract was that “Work” referred to both the physical mural and the copyright.

article thumbnail

Prince, Prince, Prints: Will the Supreme Court Revisit Fair Use?

LexBlog IP

1] That decision shook the art world, as it seems to dramatically narrow the scope of the fair use doctrine, and raises doubts about the lawfulness of many existing works. [2] Now the Warhol Foundation has petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review of the Second Circuit’s amended decision. [6] 1183 (2021).