LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 15, 2024

Guidance on using AI to Invent Due to the quick rise of artificial intelligence (AI), most (if not all) of the laws relating to the US patent system were not written with AI in mind. Vidal , a Federal Court of Appeals case that determined whether AI can be listed as an inventor on a patent application.

Inventor 52

Inventor Patent Invention Patent Application 52

Patently-O

MAY 15, 2024

” The dissenters saw a fundamental distinction between a patentee’s exclusive rights in the patented invention itself versus contractual rights in unpatented articles used with the invention. Soon thereafter, the “Oldfield Bill” proposed a number of limitations on patent rights.

Patent Law 91

Patent Law Patent Law Invention 91

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 11, 2022

Arguably, an AI system, which is a non-human, can also create or invent. But can an AI system be a named inventor on a patent? While these systems may have been programmed and/or trained by a human, the human may not have actually invented the apparatus or method claimed in the patent application.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Application Patent 52

Patently-O

APRIL 8, 2024

By Dennis Crouch In 1931, the United States Supreme Court decided a landmark case on the patentability of inventions, De Forest Radio Co. The case involved a patent infringement suit over an improved vacuum tube used in radio communications. Background The patent at issue, U.S. General Electric Co. , 571 (1931).

Invention 62

Invention Art Patent Television 62

IPilogue

NOVEMBER 1, 2021

In July 2021, the Federal Court of Australia affirmed in Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 that artificial intelligence (AI) systems may be deemed “inventors” under Australian patent law. Third, nothing in the Act dictates the contrary conclusion.”. Firstly, Kim et al. Firstly, Kim et al. However, Kim et al.

Inventor 111

Inventor Patent Invention Intellectual Property 111

The IPKat

OCTOBER 10, 2022

Image: Thomson Reuters In ‘The Artificial Inventor’ ( Thomson Reuters ), Luz Sánchez García (University of Murcia) characterises humanity as standing at the cusp of an ‘Artificial Invention Age’ in which Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer used as a tool but rather a creative partner or independent innovator.

Inventor 140

Inventor Invention Patent Ownership 140

Patently-O

JANUARY 20, 2023

Hrdy, Professor of Intellectual Property Law at University of Akron School of Law, and Daniel H. Are inventions described in works of science fiction patentable? This sort of science fiction is not patentable because it cannot logically be enabled or have credible utility when the patent is filed.

Patent Law 94

Patent Law Law Inventor Patent 94

Patently-O

MAY 18, 2023

The Patent Act requires that patent applicant describes the invention in explicit terms to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention. In other words, the specification must enable the full scope of the invention as defined by its claims. The more one claims, the more one must enable.

Patent Law 120

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 120

LexBlog IP

NOVEMBER 9, 2023

” Can you imagine the accolades someone would receive if they contributed to an invention that improves bacon? Well, it turns out that not all contributions count when it comes to being an inventor of a patent for a better method of precooking bacon. 9,980,498 (the “’498 Patent”). Iolab Corp.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Art Patent 52

Patently-O

MARCH 26, 2024

I thought I would write a more complete discussion of this important historic patent case. Atlantic Works has had a profound impact on the development of patent law, particularly in shaping the doctrine of obviousness, but more generally providing theoretical frameworks for attacking “bad patents.”

Invention 57

Invention Art Patent Designs 57

Patently-O

AUGUST 22, 2022

For our patent law course today, the students read the Justice O’Connor unanimous opinion in Bonito Boats, Inc. The Florida courts had refused to enforce the law because it conflicted with Federal Patent Law. The Florida courts had refused to enforce the law because it conflicted with Federal Patent Law.

Patent Law 90

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 90

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 5, 2023

In United States patent law, in addition to satisfying the requirements for subject-matter eligibility, novelty, enablement, nonobviousness, and written description, a patent must comply with the definiteness requirement as specified in 35 U.S.C. §112(b). [1] §112(b). [1] ” [3].

Patent Law 52

Patent Law Law Inventor Patent 52

JIPEL Copyright Blog

NOVEMBER 12, 2021

One application of AI decision-making recently considered by some scientists is the invention of new products and technologies. As a result, patent offices and courts all over the world must now consider whether AI can be a patent inventor. Both the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and U.S.

Inventor 45

Inventor Patent Invention Patent Law 45

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 25, 2022

Free Online Tools and Resources for Inventors. As an inventor, you know that protecting your invention is vital to its success. The process of patenting can be daunting, but with the right tools and resources, it doesn’t have to be. Patent Basics. Patent Search. Patent Search Tools.

Inventor 52

Inventor Intellectual Property Invention Patent Application 52

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

MARCH 1, 2024

Thus, a legal safeguard should be provided to inventors for their inventions to keep their interest in science alive. What are the biotechnological inventions? This leads them to think about protecting their inventions from unauthorized use. Who can file a patent application? Who can provide for patent rights?

Patent 92

Patent Inventor Invention Intellectual Property 92

SpicyIP

AUGUST 9, 2021

In this post, I will be analysing the recommendations pertaining to the amendment of patent laws in order to facilitate inventorship and ownership by AI. I will be restricting the discussion to the evaluation of the Indian patent regime, as the implications of AI on Indian copyright law has been previously dealt with here.

Invention 122

Invention Inventor IP Ownership 122

Patently-O

NOVEMBER 17, 2023

Teleflex delves into the old pre-AIA law of inventorship and prior art. Although the PTAB granted the petitions, it eventually sided with the patentee — agreeing that one of the asserted references did not qualify as prior art. Thus, Itou is prior art so long as it was filed prior to the Teleflex invention date.

Invention 57

Invention Inventor Art Patent Application 57

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 26, 2022

According to the Federal Circuit, US patent law contains separate and distinct written description and enablement requirements. The idea here is that the patentee did enough to enable someone to make and use the invention–isn’t that enough? Wade was good law before being overturned by the Court last term.

Patent Law 125

Patent Law Law Patent Invention 125

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 13, 2022

The Supreme Court’s 2021 decision retained assignor estoppel as a cognizable patent law doctrine that can bar a former patent owner from later challenging the patent’s validity. ” The patent document is clearly directed toward the permeable portion as a key aspect of the invention.

Invention 60

Invention Inventor Patent Application Patent 60

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 7, 2022

Certain claims in the patent recited an amount of polymer matrix inadequately disclosed, according to the Board, in a predecessor application to which the patent claimed priority. Here the prior art was none other than the Patent Office’s publication of one of the claimed priority applications. Banner , 778 F.2d

Invention 52

Invention Art Inventor Publishing 52

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 28, 2023

However, in a recent case, the Federal Circuit found that a “machine learning” claim element lacked sufficient enablement because both the claim itself and the written description of the patent to which it belonged failed to describe “ how ” the claimed invention implemented this element. § 112(a)).

Invention 52

Invention Patent Application Art Patent 52

IPilogue

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

The requirement of enablement in US patent law is codified in 35 USC s. 112 , which requires that the specification of a patent application “enable any person skilled in the art…to make and use” the invention in question.

Patent 101

Patent Invention Art Inventor 101

Patently-O

MAY 11, 2023

The “analogous arts” test is used in patent law to determine whether a particular reference is relevant for the purposes of an obviousness analysis. On occasion, the PTAB has found cited prior art to be non-analogous, and thus irrelevant for purposes of the obviousness inquiry. Unwired Planet, LLC v.

Art 44

Art Patent Invention Inventor 44

Patently-O

AUGUST 29, 2022

In Patent Law class today, we started the chapter on “disclosure” that focuses on doctrines of enablement, written description, and best mode as codified in 35 U.S.C. The inventors then took six months of repeated experiments to eventually create a version that worked up to TI’s standard. by Dennis Crouch.

Inventor 82

Inventor Invention Patent Application Art 82

Patently-O

MARCH 7, 2024

Those cases held that an inventor forfeits their right to patent a process by selling products made by that process for several years while keeping the process secret. In Kendall , inventor Winsor had developed an improved machine for manufacturing harness hames. The situation here has echoes of that concern.

Inventor 44

Inventor Invention Art Patent 44

Intepat

MAY 22, 2023

The sine qua non of an invention is its conception. However, something more than conception is required for an invention to be ready for patenting. The first way, actual reduction to practice, is by actually building the invention so that it works and others can follow how it is built.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Patent Application 52

IPilogue

SEPTEMBER 28, 2021

Apotex ], I have decided to look at precedence from around the world where courts have contemplated recognizing artificial intelligence (AI) technology as an “inventor.” However, this 2002 decision did not define whether AI technology can be an inventor. The judge stated that DABUS is not the inventor and cannot be the inventor.

Technology 111

Technology Inventor Patent Patent Law 111

The IPKat

DECEMBER 31, 2021

The EPO has launched a user consultation on grace periods for patents, the results of which will be published in early 2022 ( EPO press release ). The EPC as it currently stands does not permit a grace period in which inventors may disclose their invention without prejudicing a future patent filing. 102(b)(1)(A) ).

Patent 131

Patent Inventor Patent Application Art 131

The IP Law Blog

JANUARY 18, 2024

Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) states, ” a trademark protects brand names and logos used on goods and services. A patent protects an invention. For example, if you invent a new kind of vacuum cleaner, you would apply for a patent to protect the invention itself.” Again, it depends. Under 35 U.S.C. §

Confidentiality 113

Confidentiality Invention Business Artistic Work 113

Intepat

MAY 4, 2023

Interface of Competition Law and Patents Patent law particularly bears more relevance to antitrust jurisprudence. Patent law operates on two principles i.e. to encourage innovation and to promote the progress of science and technology. The Supreme Court in Eldred v. An example of this is the case of FTC v.

Law 52

Law Patent Settlement Inventor 52

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 24, 2023

Yet, an enigmatic question looms large: would the powers that be genuinely consider patenting such advanced technology, fully aware that patent applications might see the light of day? 4 of the ‘240 patent shows that this is the type of invention we’d like to keep secret. defense departments (e.g.,

Patent Application 52

Patent Application Invention Inventor Patent Prosecution 52

Trading Secrets

OCTOBER 24, 2023

Yet, an enigmatic question looms large: would the powers that be genuinely consider patenting such advanced technology, fully aware that patent applications might see the light of day? 4 of the ‘240 patent shows that this is the type of invention we’d like to keep secret. defense departments (e.g., Figure 4 of U.S.

Patent Application 52

Patent Application Invention Inventor Patent Prosecution 52

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 12, 2023

Yet, an enigmatic question looms large: would the powers that be genuinely consider patenting such advanced technology, fully aware that patent applications might see the light of day? 4 of the ‘240 patent shows that this is the type of invention we’d like to keep secret. defense departments (e.g.,

Patent Application 52

Patent Application Invention Inventor Technology 52

The IP Law Blog

JUNE 23, 2022

Most patent claims describe an invention using positive claim limitations that expressly recite the required elements or features of an invention. Sometimes, however, it is necessary, or desirable, to use a negative claim limitation to expressly specify an invention requires the absence of an element or feature.

Patent 96

Patent Art Invention Inventor 96

The IPKat

MARCH 26, 2023

Here’s what Daria writes: Expected introduction of a full patent examination in Switzerland: Opportunity or burden? by Daria Bohatchuk The patent law revision is currently underway in Switzerland. 59 (4) of the Patents Act, Botschaft , 11, 12). Full patent examination in Switzerland: quo vadis?

Patent 134

Patent Patent Application Invention Intellectual Property 134

Patently-O

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

Then came the patenting. Sywula was excluded from being listed as an inventor on the patents, including US11087250 and US11087252; and that was upsetting. In patent law, inventorship is tied directly to ownership. An inventor is a presumptive owner of any resulting patent rights. ” U.S.

Inventor 73

Inventor Ownership Invention Patent 73

The IP Law Blog

MAY 14, 2021

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals recently tangled with a patent application for an invention that did not have scientific support. The court affirmed a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board rejecting a patent application on these grounds. In In re Huping Hu, 2021 U.S.

Law 86

Law Inventor Patent Invention 86