The IP Law Blog

NOVEMBER 9, 2023

Can you imagine the accolades someone would receive if they contributed to an invention that improves bacon? Well, it turns out that not all contributions count when it comes to being an inventor of a patent for a better method of precooking bacon. Also, Howard was not named as an inventor. The dispute arose between HIP, Inc. (“HIP”)

Inventor 110

Inventor Invention Art Patent 110

The IPKat

FEBRUARY 14, 2024

On 12 February 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced with a press release the publication of its Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions (Guidance). The guidance embraces the use of AI in innovation and provides that AI-assisted inventions are not categorically unpatentable.

Invention 83

Invention Publishing Inventor Designs 83

The IPKat

AUGUST 11, 2023

In keeping with the so-called media "silly season" of late summer, PatKat thought she would check-in on the AI inventor debate. PatKat has been sceptical about Dr Thaler and his purported inventing machine, DABUS, for some time ( IPKat ). Sceptical Kat Has DABUS invented?

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Law Ownership 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 15, 2024

Guidance on using AI to Invent Due to the quick rise of artificial intelligence (AI), most (if not all) of the laws relating to the US patent system were not written with AI in mind. Vidal , a Federal Court of Appeals case that determined whether AI can be listed as an inventor on a patent application.

Inventor 52

Inventor Patent Invention Patent Application 52

Barry Sookman

DECEMBER 23, 2023

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems and in particular generative AI (GenAI) systems have raised the question as to whether technical advances in the useful arts or synthetic content generated using these tools can qualify for patent or copyright protection. The Thaler and SURYAST decisions appeared first on Barry Sookman.

Invention 113

Invention Copyright Patent Inventor 113

Patently-O

JULY 28, 2021

Most patents involve two or more joint inventors who all claim to have contributed significantly to the invention. Conception of the invention is typically seen as the critical legal determinant of invention and some courts have written that each joint inventor must have contributed substantially to the conception of the invention.*

Inventor 127

Inventor Invention Patent Prosecution Art 127

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 11, 2022

Arguably, an AI system, which is a non-human, can also create or invent. But can an AI system be a named inventor on a patent? While these systems may have been programmed and/or trained by a human, the human may not have actually invented the apparatus or method claimed in the patent application. In the matter of the ’350 Appl.,

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Application Patent 52

Intellectual Property Law Blog

AUGUST 30, 2021

Inventors and patent attorneys often face the challenge of effectively protecting new AI technology development. The rule of thumb is to focus the patent protection on what the inventors improve over the conventional technology. The state-of-art AI systems are far from perfection. 1) Training phase.

Invention 242

Invention Patent Privacy Inventor 242

IP Intelligence

FEBRUARY 23, 2024

Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released its much anticipated Inventorship Guidance on AI-Assisted Inventions (“Guidance”). [1] The Guidance strives to ensure balance between protecting and incentivizing AI-assisted inventions and not hindering future human innovation, as “the patent system is designed to encourage human ingenuity.” [2]

Invention 52

Invention Inventor Patent Application Designs 52

Patently-O

APRIL 8, 2024

By Dennis Crouch In 1931, the United States Supreme Court decided a landmark case on the patentability of inventions, De Forest Radio Co. 103 as part of the Patent Act of 1952, it nonetheless applied a similar requirement for “invention.” This was an improvement over prior art vacuum tubes which used weaker vacuums.

Invention 62

Invention Art Patent Television 62

Patently-O

MAY 25, 2023

These patents, US Patents 8,048,032, RE45,380, RE45,776, RE45,760, and RE47,379, cover inventions devised to offer an “enhanced backup support” in contrast to using a guide catheter individually. Patent 7,736,355 (“Itou”) could be regarded as prior art. The pivotal question on appeal was whether U.S.

Invention 70

Invention Inventor Art Patent Application 70

JD Supra Law

AUGUST 25, 2022

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that a prior art patent’s summarization of a report authored by the inventors of a patent challenged under inter partes review (IPR) did not constitute a disclosure “by another” under pre-America Invents Act § 102(e). Regents of Univ. of Minnesota, Case No. 21-2057 (Fed.

Inventor 52

Inventor Art Reporting Invention 52

The IPKat

OCTOBER 10, 2022

Image: Thomson Reuters In ‘The Artificial Inventor’ ( Thomson Reuters ), Luz Sánchez García (University of Murcia) characterises humanity as standing at the cusp of an ‘Artificial Invention Age’ in which Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer used as a tool but rather a creative partner or independent innovator.

Inventor 140

Inventor Invention Patent Ownership 140

LexBlog IP

DECEMBER 15, 2023

Patent 7,736,355 (“the ’355 patent”) does not qualify as prior art to related U.S. Patents 8,048,032, RE45,380, RE45,776, RE45,760, and RE47,379 (collectively, “the challenged patents”) under pre-AIA’s first-to-invent provisions. Teleflex Innovations S.A.R.L. , § 102(e). § 102(e).

Art 52

Art Inventor Invention Patent 52

SpicyIP

APRIL 30, 2024

By Kevin Preji On 28th Feb, 2024, the Delhi High Court in Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC vs Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs in allowing an appeal, clarified the role of the ‘person skilled in the art’ (‘PSITA’) in determining non-obviousness. The patent office issued a first examination report in June 2019, (7 years later!)

Invention 105

Invention Art Designs Design 105

Intellectual Property Law Blog

FEBRUARY 13, 2024

In the IPRs, Medtronic asserted that the “Itou” reference qualified as prior art under the pre-AIA § 102(e). 16, 2023) , the Federal Circuit considered whether U.S. Background Medtronic filed two IPR petitions challenging certain claims in Teleflex’s ’116 patent.

Invention 130

Invention Art Inventor Patent 130

LexBlog IP

NOVEMBER 9, 2023

” Can you imagine the accolades someone would receive if they contributed to an invention that improves bacon? Well, it turns out that not all contributions count when it comes to being an inventor of a patent for a better method of precooking bacon. Also, Howard was not named as an inventor. The court in Pannu v.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Art Patent 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 21, 2024

Inventors and patent practitioners filing patent applications before U.S. patent application has a duty to disclose to the USPTO all information which is materially relevant in assessing the patentability of the invention. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a long-anticipated Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions.

Invention 52

Invention Inventor Patent Application Patent 52

Patently-O

MARCH 26, 2024

The Supreme Court ultimately reversed the lower court’s decision upholding the patent and found instead that Brady’s claimed invention lacked novelty and did not constitute a patentable advance over the prior art. Such inventors are worthy of all favor. Atlantic Works v. 63, 67 (2020).

Invention 57

Invention Art Patent Designs 57

IPilogue

NOVEMBER 1, 2021

In July 2021, the Federal Court of Australia affirmed in Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 that artificial intelligence (AI) systems may be deemed “inventors” under Australian patent law. found in paragraph 10 of the Thaler decision: “First, an inventor is an agent noun; an agent can be a person or thing that invents.

Inventor 111

Inventor Patent Invention Intellectual Property 111

Patently-O

MAY 31, 2022

This case raises the novel legal issue of whether a patent can be obtained for an invention created by an artificial intelligence (AI) in the absence of a traditional human inventor (“AI-Generated Invention”). This ignores fundamental statutory and constitutional principles and also stymies innovation. Appellee Brief.

Invention 89

Invention Inventor Art Patent 89

Patently-O

NOVEMBER 13, 2023

by Dennis Crouch Berkely Center for Law & Technology is hosting a great half-day virtual-conference this week: “AI as an Inventing Tool – it’s Implications for Patent Law” organized by Prof. The Winslow Tableau presents an unrealistic conception of the PHOSITA possessing encyclopedic knowledge of all prior art.

Patent Law 67

Patent Law Invention Law Art 67

Patently-O

NOVEMBER 28, 2023

RapidPulse decision in that provides important guidance on the use of a provisional patent application’s filing date for 102(a)(2) prior art under the America Invents Act. 102(a)(2) is a bit clunky, but its effect is to codify the first-to-file regime created by the America Invents Act of 2011. . = = = The language of 35 U.S.C.

Art 48

Art Inventor Publishing Invention 48

Patently-O

MAY 19, 2022

And the Question : Does the prior publication count as prior art in an IPR obviousness analysis? = = =. Although the Board granted the petition, it eventually concluded that the prior publication was not prior art and thus sided with the patentee in its final written decision. A person shall be entitled to a patent unless —. (a)

Invention 54

Invention Inventor Art Patent 54

Patently-O

FEBRUARY 12, 2024

Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently published examination guidance and a request for comments on the treatment of inventorship for inventions created with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions. Rather, the human must provide significant inventive contribution).

Inventor 117

Inventor Invention Patent Application Designs 117

Patently-O

AUGUST 17, 2021

Ironburg Inventions ( Fed. The focus of the appeal is whether the purported “Burns” reference should count as prior art. the prior art disclosures of these documents are the same. On appeal, the Federal Circuit found “overwhelming evidence” that the reference was prior art. by Dennis Crouch.

Art 123

Art Litigation Publishing Inventor 123

JD Supra Law

JULY 7, 2023

An invention is not patentable if it was described in, or obvious in view of, an earlier printed publication. This blog post addresses how to overcome an anticipation or obviousness rejection where an inventor is the author or otherwise the source of subject matter in the publication cited as prior art. See 35 U.S.C. By: Mintz

Art 52

Art Inventor Invention Blogging 52

Intellectual Property Law Blog

MAY 22, 2023

Enablement Section 112(a) of the Patent Act requires that a patent specification includes “a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making an using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art…to make and use the same.

Invention 246

Invention Art Patent Inventor 246

JD Supra Law

MAY 17, 2023

An inventor must make a contribution to the claimed invention that is not insignificant in quality, when that contribution is measured against the dimension of the full invention. The Court reversed the district court’s decision regarding joint inventorship pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § By: WilmerHale

Art 97

Art Inventor Invention Patent 97

U.S. Department of Commerce

JUNE 9, 2022

Visit the Reopened National Inventors Hall of Fame Museum. The National Inventors Hall of Fame (NIHF) Museum is now open to the public! To be inducted into the National Inventors Hall of Fame, an inventor must hold a U.S. June 9, 2022. KCPullen@doc.gov. Thu, 06/09/2022 - 12:24. Intellectual property. Kathi Vidal.

Inventor 65

Inventor Invention Intellectual Property Branding 65

Patently-O

SEPTEMBER 11, 2023

by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit recently issued an important decision regarding the analogous art doctrine in Netflix v. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s sided with the patentee, holding that a key prior art reference was not analogous art. 22-1138, — F.4th 4th — (Fed.

Art 54

Art Invention Patent Drafting Patent 54

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 25, 2022

Free Online Tools and Resources for Inventors. As an inventor, you know that protecting your invention is vital to its success. In this blog post, we will discuss several free online tools and resources that every inventor should know about. Jump to a Section: USPTO Website. Events and Webinars. Patent Basics.

Inventor 52

Inventor Intellectual Property Invention Patent Application 52

LexBlog IP

JUNE 30, 2023

Sanofi countered that this particular fixation problem was identified in one of the other prior art references, not by the challenged patent. Mylan responded the problems identified in the prior art and those identified in the challenged patent were themselves analogous.

Art 52

Art Invention Inventor Patent 52

Larson & Larson

FEBRUARY 13, 2021

Often, the reason that the patent office will cite for rejecting an application is the presence of prior art. This makes the term ‘prior art’ an important concept for inventors to understand. What is Prior Art? You may have heard the term ‘prior art’ before in the context of patents.

Art 52

Art Patent Invention Patent Application 52

Velocity of Content

MARCH 16, 2022

This is why an unadorned set of directions, such as stripped-down basic instructions in a baking recipe, does not qualify, but “Mastering the Art of French Cooking” by Julia Child (a book that contains much more expressive text, which served to make it a bestseller) does. Is there a case for protecting AI-devised inventions by IP rights?

Inventor 98

Inventor Editing Copyright Copyright Law 98

Patently-O

MARCH 12, 2022

I recently posted a chart showing that there is a significant difference in technology focus of patents tied to US-Inventors as compared with Non-US-inventors. Applications from US Inventors were significantly more likely to be rejected on eligibility than non-US Inventors (15% vs 10%). US Inventors.

Inventor 139

Inventor Art Invention Business 139

JIPEL Copyright Blog

NOVEMBER 12, 2021

One application of AI decision-making recently considered by some scientists is the invention of new products and technologies. As a result, patent offices and courts all over the world must now consider whether AI can be a patent inventor. federal courts have found that AI generated inventions are not patentable. Today, U.S.

Inventor 45

Inventor Patent Invention Patent Law 45