Barry Sookman

DECEMBER 23, 2023

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems and in particular generative AI (GenAI) systems have raised the question as to whether technical advances in the useful arts or synthetic content generated using these tools can qualify for patent or copyright protection. The Thaler and SURYAST decisions appeared first on Barry Sookman.

Invention 113

Invention Copyright Patent Inventor 113

Patently-O

MARCH 21, 2023

Vidal ask the Supreme Court one simple question: Does the Patent Act categorically restrict the statutory term ‘inventor’ to human beings alone? We are are now at a point where it is easy to see an AI tool creating inventive output. In Thaler’s view, DABUS was the inventor since it was the “individual.

Inventor 120

Inventor Invention Patent Art 120

The IP Law Blog

NOVEMBER 9, 2023

Can you imagine the accolades someone would receive if they contributed to an invention that improves bacon? Well, it turns out that not all contributions count when it comes to being an inventor of a patent for a better method of precooking bacon. 9,980,498 (the “’498 Patent”). Also, Howard was not named as an inventor.

Inventor 110

Inventor Invention Art Patent 110

Patently-O

APRIL 30, 2024

by Dennis Crouch This article explores the impact of Generative AI on prior art and potential revisions to patent examination standards to address the rising tidal wave of AI-generated, often speculative, disclosures that could undermine the patent system’s integrity. Still, seemingly qualify as prior art under 35 U.S.C.

Art 109

Art Invention Patent Application Publishing 109

The IPKat

FEBRUARY 14, 2024

On 12 February 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced with a press release the publication of its Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions (Guidance). The guidance embraces the use of AI in innovation and provides that AI-assisted inventions are not categorically unpatentable.

Invention 83

Invention Publishing Inventor Designs 83

The IPKat

AUGUST 11, 2023

In keeping with the so-called media "silly season" of late summer, PatKat thought she would check-in on the AI inventor debate. PatKat has been sceptical about Dr Thaler and his purported inventing machine, DABUS, for some time ( IPKat ). Sceptical Kat Has DABUS invented?

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Law Ownership 52

Patently-O

JULY 28, 2021

Most patents involve two or more joint inventors who all claim to have contributed significantly to the invention. The MPEP, for example, includes a statement in all-caps that “CONCEPTION MUST BE DONE IN THE MIND OF THE INVENTOR.” Above, I referred to conception as the key invention marker.

Inventor 127

Inventor Invention Patent Prosecution Art 127

The IPKat

OCTOBER 10, 2022

Image: Thomson Reuters In ‘The Artificial Inventor’ ( Thomson Reuters ), Luz Sánchez García (University of Murcia) characterises humanity as standing at the cusp of an ‘Artificial Invention Age’ in which Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer used as a tool but rather a creative partner or independent innovator.

Inventor 140

Inventor Invention Patent Ownership 140

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 11, 2022

Previously, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) has found that a non-human may infringe patents. Arguably, an AI system, which is a non-human, can also create or invent. But can an AI system be a named inventor on a patent? Patent Appl. Thaler, assignee, filed U.S.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Application Patent 52

Patently-O

APRIL 8, 2024

By Dennis Crouch In 1931, the United States Supreme Court decided a landmark case on the patentability of inventions, De Forest Radio Co. The case involved a patent infringement suit over an improved vacuum tube used in radio communications. Background The patent at issue, U.S. General Electric Co. , 571 (1931).

Invention 62

Invention Art Patent Television 62

IP Intelligence

FEBRUARY 23, 2024

Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released its much anticipated Inventorship Guidance on AI-Assisted Inventions (“Guidance”). [1] 1] The Guidance is retroactive, meaning it applies to all patent applications and issued patents filed before, on or after February 13, 2024. In Thaler v. 4] Based on U.S. 4] Based on U.S.

Invention 52

Invention Inventor Patent Application Designs 52

Patently-O

MAY 25, 2023

2023) The case involving Medtronic and Teleflex centered on five patents related to a coaxial guide catheter used in interventional cardiology procedures. In an attempt to invalidate these patents, Medtronic launched a succession of Inter Partes Review (IPR) petitions. Patent 7,736,355 (“Itou”) could be regarded as prior art.

Invention 70

Invention Inventor Art Patent Application 70

Intellectual Property Law Blog

FEBRUARY 13, 2024

Background Medtronic filed two IPR petitions challenging certain claims in Teleflex’s ’116 patent. In the IPRs, Medtronic asserted that the “Itou” reference qualified as prior art under the pre-AIA § 102(e). In the IPRs, Medtronic asserted that the “Itou” reference qualified as prior art under the pre-AIA § 102(e).

Invention 130

Invention Art Inventor Patent 130

IPilogue

NOVEMBER 1, 2021

In July 2021, the Federal Court of Australia affirmed in Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 that artificial intelligence (AI) systems may be deemed “inventors” under Australian patent law. Hilty, and Peter R. Slowinski expound on the evolving case-law in this subject area. Firstly, Kim et al. Firstly, Kim et al.

Inventor 111

Inventor Patent Invention Intellectual Property 111

SpicyIP

APRIL 30, 2024

Controller of Patents decision on the role of PSITA in determining non obviousness, we are pleased to bring to you this post by Kevin Preji. This post attempts to critically analyse the relevance of difference in the purported function of the invention and prior art to determine non-obviousness in identifying the inventive step.

Invention 111

Invention Art Designs Design 111

LexBlog IP

DECEMBER 15, 2023

Patent 7,736,355 (“the ’355 patent”) does not qualify as prior art to related U.S. Patents 8,048,032, RE45,380, RE45,776, RE45,760, and RE47,379 (collectively, “the challenged patents”) under pre-AIA’s first-to-invent provisions. Teleflex Innovations S.A.R.L. ,

Art 52

Art Inventor Invention Patent 52

Patently-O

NOVEMBER 13, 2023

by Dennis Crouch Berkely Center for Law & Technology is hosting a great half-day virtual-conference this week: “AI as an Inventing Tool – it’s Implications for Patent Law” organized by Prof. The Winslow Tableau presents an unrealistic conception of the PHOSITA possessing encyclopedic knowledge of all prior art.

Patent Law 67

Patent Law Invention Law Art 67

JD Supra Law

AUGUST 25, 2022

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that a prior art patent’s summarization of a report authored by the inventors of a patent challenged under inter partes review (IPR) did not constitute a disclosure “by another” under pre-America Invents Act § 102(e). Regents of Univ. of Minnesota, Case No.

Inventor 52

Inventor Art Reporting Invention 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 21, 2024

Inventors and patent practitioners filing patent applications before U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) may have an obligation to disclose if artificial intelligence (AI) is used in the innovation process. the Office is aware of and evaluates the teachings of all information material to patentability.”

Invention 52

Invention Inventor Patent Application Patent 52

LexBlog IP

NOVEMBER 9, 2023

” Can you imagine the accolades someone would receive if they contributed to an invention that improves bacon? Well, it turns out that not all contributions count when it comes to being an inventor of a patent for a better method of precooking bacon. 9,980,498 (the “’498 Patent”). Iolab Corp.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Art Patent 52

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

MARCH 1, 2024

Thus, a legal safeguard should be provided to inventors for their inventions to keep their interest in science alive. What are the biotechnological inventions? This leads them to think about protecting their inventions from unauthorized use. What is patent? Who can file a patent application?

Patent 92

Patent Inventor Invention Intellectual Property 92

Intellectual Property Law Blog

MAY 22, 2023

After a nine-year saga, beginning when Amgen sued Sanofi for allegedly infringing two of its patents in 2014, the Supreme Court held that Amgen’s asserted patents failed to satisfy the enablement requirement under 35 U.S.C. § 112(a), and are thus invalid. In re Wands , 858 F.2d 2d at 737, 8 USPQ2d at 1404 (Fed.

Invention 246

Invention Art Patent Inventor 246

Patently-O

MARCH 26, 2024

I thought I would write a more complete discussion of this important historic patent case. Atlantic Works has had a profound impact on the development of patent law, particularly in shaping the doctrine of obviousness, but more generally providing theoretical frameworks for attacking “bad patents.” Claims: 1.

Invention 57

Invention Art Patent Designs 57

Intellectual Property Law Blog

JUNE 23, 2023

On June 22, 2023, Senators Chris Coons (D-DE) and Thom Tillis (R-NC) introduced the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2023 , which seeks to clarify the jurisprudence surrounding 35 U.S.C. § A mental process performed solely in the mind of a human being. An unmodified human gene, as that gene exists in the human body.

Patent 130

Patent Invention Inventor Business 130

Intellectual Property Law Blog

JUNE 7, 2023

A patent strategy informed by the unique considerations raised by generative AI will optimize protections for innovations in the field. Patent strategies should reflect the current legal landscape as well as anticipate potential future legal developments. PART ONE Patent Claims and Inventorship The Federal Circuit in Thaler v.

Patent 130

Patent Intellectual Property Patent Application Inventor 130

Patently-O

FEBRUARY 12, 2024

Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently published examination guidance and a request for comments on the treatment of inventorship for inventions created with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions. patents and patent applications. Vidal , 43 F.4th

Inventor 117

Inventor Invention Patent Application Designs 117

Patent Trademark Blog

APRIL 19, 2023

What does patent obvious mean? To be patentable, an invention must be novel and nonobvious. A novel invention is new, unique, something hasn’t been before. But, what makes a patent application obvious? Want to file a nonobvious patent? Who really decides if a claimed invention is obvious?

Patent 98

Patent Patent Application Invention Art 98

Patently-O

MAY 31, 2022

This case raises the novel legal issue of whether a patent can be obtained for an invention created by an artificial intelligence (AI) in the absence of a traditional human inventor (“AI-Generated Invention”). Dynamics patents cover electronic emulation magnetic stripes (on, for instance credit cards).

Invention 89

Invention Inventor Art Patent 89

Patently-O

MAY 15, 2024

as a major turning point in American patent and antitrust law. The Court’s 4-3 decision favored the patentee and allowed the patent owner to place restrictions on the use of its patented product even after sale. Just a few years later, the Supreme Court reversed course in Motion Picture Patents Co.

Patent Law 91

Patent Law Patent Law Invention 91

Patently-O

NOVEMBER 28, 2023

by Dennis Crouch The Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently designated as precedential a portion of its Penumbra v. RapidPulse decision in that provides important guidance on the use of a provisional patent application’s filing date for 102(a)(2) prior art under the America Invents Act. Penumbra, Inc.

Art 48

Art Inventor Publishing Invention 48

Larson & Larson

FEBRUARY 13, 2021

A high number of patent applications are given a non-final rejection from the USPTO according to Yale. Often, the reason that the patent office will cite for rejecting an application is the presence of prior art. This makes the term ‘prior art’ an important concept for inventors to understand.

Art 52

Art Patent Invention Patent Application 52

Patently-O

AUGUST 17, 2021

Ironburg Inventions ( Fed. Ironburg won a $4 million judgment regarding two patents (now on appeal) and the district court stayed the litigation regarding U.S. Ironburg won a $4 million judgment regarding two patents (now on appeal) and the district court stayed the litigation regarding U.S. Patent Nos. ” Fed.

Art 123

Art Litigation Publishing Inventor 123

JD Supra Law

OCTOBER 20, 2023

At the Inter Partes review trial, Patent Owner attempted to swear behind Petitioner’s primary prior art reference by showing that the inventors of the asserted patents had conceived of the invention before the priority date of the reference. The Board determined that Patent Owner’s evidence was insufficient.

Inventor 65

Inventor Patent Invention Art 65

Patently-O

MAY 19, 2022

Cheyer & Martin (but not Moran) file for patent protection on aspects of the OAA that were not fully disclosed within the original publication. And the Question : Does the prior publication count as prior art in an IPR obviousness analysis? = = =. A person shall be entitled to a patent unless —. (a) In re Katz, 687 F.2d

Invention 54

Invention Inventor Art Patent 54

JD Supra Law

MAY 17, 2023

An inventor must make a contribution to the claimed invention that is not insignificant in quality, when that contribution is measured against the dimension of the full invention. The Court reversed the district court’s decision regarding joint inventorship pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § By: WilmerHale

Art 97

Art Inventor Invention Patent 97

JIPEL Copyright Blog

NOVEMBER 12, 2021

One application of AI decision-making recently considered by some scientists is the invention of new products and technologies. As a result, patent offices and courts all over the world must now consider whether AI can be a patent inventor. Both the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and U.S.

Inventor 45

Inventor Patent Invention Patent Law 45

Intepat

APRIL 20, 2022

To be granted a patent, an invention by the applicant must be novel, non-obvious, and must be such that can be manufactured or used in industry. Besides these basic, requirements an invention must also not fall under the criteria of non-patentable subject matter as discussed in Sections 3, 4, and 5 of the Patents Act, 1970 (“ Act ”).

Patent 98

Patent Invention Inventor Art 98