Remove Artistic Work Remove Brands Remove Editing Remove Ownership
article thumbnail

Centering Artists’ Voices Within IP Discourse

IPilogue

This article was prompted in part by Tabathia, also known as The Adorned Fox (“TAF”), whose post on trademarking her brand spurred me to reach out and learn more about her experience. This interview has been edited for brevity and clarity; all emphases are mine. Emily (E): What prompted you to protect TAF and trademark your brand?

article thumbnail

Limited Edition Products and their IP Protection

IIPRD

These products are named “Limited Editions”. It is because of these factors that everyone loves to collect these limited editions products. Every industry from clothing to cosmetics to automobile, launches these editions to increase their market standing. But how can these Limited-Edition Products be protected?

Editing 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

IP and NFTs: Where are We?

LexBlog IP

NFTs are units of data stored on a blockchain that signify ownership of (supposedly) unique digital media items. February 2022: Nike sues online retailer StockX for trademark infringement based on StockX’s sale of NFTs for limited edition Nike sneakers that include images of the sneaker. The case is in the discovery phase.

IP 52
article thumbnail

“For Sale: This Article”: an overview of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and IP

IP Whiteboard

This means that each time an NFT changes hands, the transaction is verified, adding a new record to the chain of ownership. The ownership of an NFT can be easily authenticated, meaning buyers can have confidence that they are buying the real deal. Multiple pieces of copyright material may exist in a single digital work.

article thumbnail

USC IP year in review, TM/ROP

43(B)log

It was insufficient to allege that Simplify “has deprived [him] of the fundamental value of his name and abilities with regard to editing the publication,” or that his inability to control the quality of the work “depriv[ed] him of the ability to maintain his reputation and standing in the marketplace.” But Abrahams failed to do so.

IP 94