Remove companies godaddy-inc
article thumbnail

GoDaddy Obtains Section 230 Immunity Despite Plaintiffs’ “Sympathetic” Claims

The IP Law Blog

GoDaddy, Inc., the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of rather sympathetic claims against GoDaddy and found that section 230 immunity would apply to plaintiffs’ claims. In 2007, he registered the domain name “scottrigsbyfoundation.org” with GoDaddy. On February 3, 2023, in the case Rigsby v.

article thumbnail

GoDaddy Obtains Section 230 Immunity Despite Plaintiffs’ “Sympathetic” Claims

LexBlog IP

GoDaddy, Inc., the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of rather sympathetic claims against GoDaddy and found that section 230 immunity would apply to plaintiffs’ claims. In 2007, he registered the domain name “scottrigsbyfoundation.org” with GoDaddy. On February 3, 2023, in the case Rigsby v.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

HSI Agent Details U.S. Pirate Site Domain Seizure Mechanism in Affidavit

TorrentFreak

Friend MTS Referral to HSI in September At least two months before World Cup 2022 began, in its role as representative of FIFA, UK-based anti-piracy company Friend MTS (which is heavily involved in dynamic stream blocking in Europe) began supplying HSI with information on “several” domains. Identity Digital Inc.,

Reporting 121
article thumbnail

Messaging Apps Raise Tricky E-Discovery Issues (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

GoDaddy is exemplary of the problems that Facebook Messenger’s “unsend” feature can present in litigation. Plaintiff’s action effectively prevented Mudro—who was helping plaintiff marshal evidence to support her discrimination claims—from producing the original, unaltered messages in response to a GoDaddy subpoena. Remodeling, Inc.

Blogging 106
article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

SpicyIP

GoDaddy LLC, Dynadot LLC to immediately lock and suspend the domain names [link] , [link] and [link]. Entertainment Inc., Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Netflix Studios, LLC, Paramount Pictures Corporation, Disney Enterprises, Inc. Controller of Patents and Designs and Raytheon Company v. Warner Bros.

IP 124