Remove companies nike-inc
article thumbnail

What legal lines can’t NFTs cross? The Nike v StockX lawsuit may provide answers

IPilogue

On February 3 rd 2022 Nike Inc. Nike alleges that StockX is selling unauthorized non-fungible tokens (“NFTs”) of Nike sneakers. The Nike Suit. Nike claimed that the StockX NFTs were not a collaboration with them, and that they were authorized by Nike to be sold and promoted. Recent Developments.

article thumbnail

Nike, Others Score Win In 'Ballin' Campaign TM Suit

IP Law 360

A Texas federal judge has officially thrown out a graphic designer's trademark infringement suit against companies like Nike Inc., agreeing with a magistrate judge's decision that found his use of the mark "ballin" was minor.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Full Court Press: NIKE Files Trademark Infringement Lawsuit Against BAPE

JD Supra Law

recently sued Japanese streetwear company, A Bathing Ape (BAPE), in the Southern District of New York, alleging that BAPE’s business model revolves around offering “near verbatim” copies of Nike’s iconic Air Force 1, Air Jordan, and Dunk designs, for which it has registered and common law trade dress rights. By: ArentFox Schiff

article thumbnail

Nike Claims Lululemon's Shoes Rip Off Textile Patents

IP Law 360

hit Lululemon Athletica Inc. with a patent infringement lawsuit in New York federal court Monday, accusing the rival athletic wear company of selling shoes that rip off three of Nike's footwear textile patents.

Patent 40
article thumbnail

Nike Accuses Another Designer Of Selling Fake Sneakers

IP Law 360

is expanding its legal war against sneakers that allegedly riff on the company's famous trade dress, this time targeting a designer who Nike says ripped off the look of the Air Force 1.

Designs 66
article thumbnail

Tribunal Burden – Nike v. Adidas

Patently-O

Nike, Inc. This ongoing dispute between the two athletic apparel companies has been ongoing since Adidas filed its IPR petition back in in 2012. The appeals have all centered on Nike’s proposed substitute claims. Initially, the Board refused to allow Nike to enter a substitute claim. Nike, Inc.

Patent 75
article thumbnail

Kat Von D, Think Before You Ink

IPilogue

District Court for the Central District of California against Katherine Von Drachenberg, famously known as Kat Von D (“Kat Von D”), and her companies Kat Von D, Inc. and High Voltage Tattoo, Inc. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. , Supreme Court in The Andy Warhol Foundation for The Visual Arts, Inc.