Remove Contracts Remove Definition Remove Designs Remove False Advertising
article thumbnail

copying/explicit references let Roblox proceed with dubious (c) claim; Lego should be watching

43(B)log

Roblox sued for copyright infringement, false advertising, trademark infringement, false association and false designation of origin, trade dress infringement, intentional interference with contractual relations, breach of contract, and false advertising and unfair competition under California law.

Copying 94
article thumbnail

The fact/opinion divide: threat or menace? 9th Cir revives suit against Malwarebytes

43(B)log

Enigma sued its competitor Malwarebytes for Lanham Act false advertising and NY business torts for designating its products as “malicious,” “threats,” and “potentially unwanted programs” (PUPs). The district court dismissed the complaint on the grounds that these designations were “non-actionable statements of opinion.”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

(c), TM, and other claims from busted partnership to sell colored copper fixtures

43(B)log

CC has a recent trademark registration for a design mark “consist[ing] of the stylized wording ‘COLOR COPPER.COM”, [with] a diamond shape between the wording ‘COLOR’ and ‘COPPER’ made up of four smaller diamonds, each diamond having a pattern inside of it,” COPPER.COM disclaimed. There’s no written agreement” will do it.]

article thumbnail

"The usual California claims"

43(B)log

They are: the Unfair Competition Law (UCL); the False Advertising Law (FAL); and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA). While they often cover the same conduct in false advertising cases and are cumulative of each other, they have differences. UCL: The UCL, California Business and Professions Code § 17200 et seq.,

article thumbnail

Court trims claims against for-profit "charity" sweepstakes site that keeps 85% of "donations"

43(B)log

It contracts with Charities Aid Foundation of America, which in turn delivers donated funds to designated charities. For certain “celebrity experiences,” 60% of the money donated goes to CAFA to be paid to the designated charity, but for Omaze-owned campaigns, Omaze keeps 85%. The court granted the motion to dismiss in part.

article thumbnail

A little more than kin and less than kind: KIND bar "All Natural" class action fails

43(B)log

Other developments “sharply contracted” the scope of the claims to the “All Natural” claim on three product lines. The earlier definition used in the case was heavily dependent on now-abandoned “Non GMO” claims. Without the GMO context, the court found that there was no objective definition of “all natural.”

article thumbnail

The SHOP SAFE Act Is a Terrible Bill That Will Eliminate Online Marketplaces

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

It claims to focus on “counterfeits” that could harm consumer “health and safety,” but those are both lies designed to make the bill seem narrower and more balanced than it actually is. If the latter, then the definition will pick up smallish online retailers that have small marketplace components.

Trademark 137