Remove Contracts Remove False Advertising Remove Litigation Remove Social Media
article thumbnail

Monster wins permanent injunction against VPX in false advertising case

43(B)log

12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on false advertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in false advertising cases. Plus, they hadn’t removed existing false advertising from their social media accounts. and] expects to complete.

article thumbnail

WIPIP session 4: ™ & Consumers

43(B)log

Mary Katherine Amerine, Reasonably Careless Consumers in TM & False Advertising How do courts treat consumers in TM and false advertising cases? False advertising uses v different framework: consider the challenged ad as a whole, including disclaimers and qualifying language. Beer Nuts, Bulls’ Eye v.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

competitor's alleged hijacking of Facebook page could violate 43(a)

43(B)log

3, 2022) Plaintiffs alleged that they employed the individual defendants in part to manage social media advertising and promotion for plaintiffs’ baking businesses, aka La Baguette. The law on the ownership of a social media pages created by employees for employers is evolving rapidly and varies between jurisdictions.

article thumbnail

Timeshare developer wins disgorgement against timeshare exit marketers despite unclean hands

43(B)log

Bluegreen sued a lot of entities, but only the marketing defendants remained in the case: their role was “to advertise timeshare exit services by promoting a legitimate process to exit timeshare contracts while protecting the customers’ credit.” Any “exit” came from default.

article thumbnail

false advertising & bankruptcy law: $18 million for deceptive campaign in violation of automatic stay

43(B)log

On social media: "Were U planning on telling UR customers" [to switch before they lose service]? for the losses caused by intentionally and wrongfully interfering with the Debtors’ customer contracts and good will. Does its awareness of the stay mean that its false advertising violates the automatic stay?

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

SpicyIP

The decisions in the first category, i.e., Top 10 IP Cases/Judgements (Topicality/Impact) reflect those that we thought were important from a topical point of view and were covered by the media in some way owing to the importance of parties litigating or the issue being considered or for impact on industry and innovation/creativity ecosystem etc.

IP 124
article thumbnail

WIPIP: Innovation Theory & TM

43(B)log

Social media influencers seem reasonably held liable, but what about when the seller is texting friends. Interested in sellers’ understanding of the contracts. Lemley: is/should there be contributory false advertising liability? Lay sellers don’t have strong understanding of laws and/or don’t feel bound by them.