article thumbnail

False advertising about a bankrupt competitor doesn't violate the automatic stay

43(B)log

6, 2022) The district court reverses the bankruptcy court ruling ( discussed here ) that held that false advertising had interfered with the debtor’s estate in violation of the automatic stay. Windstream has a 2-year contract. With Spectrum there are no contracts. In re Windstream Holdings, Inc., 2022 WL 5245633, No.

article thumbnail

Monster wins permanent injunction against VPX in false advertising case

43(B)log

12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on false advertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in false advertising cases. But Defendants have brought on themselves these unfortunate consequences through their false advertising.”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

WIPIP session 4: ™ & Consumers

43(B)log

Mary Katherine Amerine, Reasonably Careless Consumers in TM & False Advertising How do courts treat consumers in TM and false advertising cases? False advertising uses v different framework: consider the challenged ad as a whole, including disclaimers and qualifying language. Beer Nuts, Bulls’ Eye v.

article thumbnail

Clone wars: truthful statements about cloned horses don't constitute false association

43(B)log

Litigation ensued, with lots of claims, including the Lanham Act claims on which I will focus, though breach of contract claims were prominent and survived a motion to dismiss. The Lanham Act claims were styled as false association, “false association with celebrity status,” false designation of origin, and false advertising.

article thumbnail

Another "buy" button lawsuit over digital licenses continues

43(B)log

In re Amazon Prime Video Litig., Though the “buy” button manifests consent to a contract, “certain terms and policies could fail to meet statutory standards of clearness and effectiveness.” 2024 WL 1138906, No. 2:22-cv-00401-RSM (W.D. It was also plausible that the TOS didn’t sufficiently disclose the restrictions.

Licensing 114
article thumbnail

J&J Subsidiary Wins $18 Million Judgment Against Surgical Tool Counterfeiter

IP Watchdog

The laundry list of accusations also included trademark dilution, false advertising, common law unjust enrichment, common law tortious interference with contract, and breach of settlement agreement.

article thumbnail

Timeshare case: proof of causation/damages is difficult especially w/o grasp of Bayesian probability

43(B)log

20, 2021) In this timeshare exit false advertising litigation, the court excludes Wyndham’s expert. Timeshare exit entities like defendant TET used “online advertising and oral sales pitches to timeshare owners to convince them to sign up for TET’s service.” Sussman, 2021 WL 4948099, No. 6:18-cv-2171-GAP-DCI (M.D.