Remove Contracts Remove Government Remove Inventor Remove Ownership
article thumbnail

[Guest post] Ownership of IP rights by DAOs – the future is nigh?

The IPKat

Here's what Marianna writes: Ownership of IP rights by DAOs – the future is nigh? by Marianna Ryan Decentralised Autonomous Organisations (DAOs) are a new type of quasi-corporate entities, existing with the use of blockchain and smart contracts. The use of blockchain and smart contracts in the creation of DAOs has its pros and cons.

Ownership 134
article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Weighs in on Temporal Rigidity of the Baye-Dole Act’s Licensing Provisions

Intellectual Property Law Blog

200, passed in 1980, streamlined and relaxed federal government policy regarding patent rights to inventions developed with federal grant money. Prior to Bayh-Dole, some federal agencies had patent policies which required grant recipients to give ownership of resulting patents to the government.

Licensing 130
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Viral TikTok Music Trends as Low-Cost Marketing – Who gets to choose how and when a song is released?

IPilogue

This sentiment plays into inherent feelings of property ownership and control over your property —in this case, your intellectual property (“IP”. But what are the legal underpinnings that tie Halsey’s (and other artists’) ownership and control of their music? The short answer, as usual in law, is that it depends.

Music 119
article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Weighs in on Temporal Rigidity of the Baye-Dole Act’s Licensing Provisions

LexBlog IP

United States , [1] the Federal Circuit rejected a strict temporal limitation on when the Government’s license rights in patents stemming from federally funded research is triggered under the Bayh-Dole Act. By December 1996, the two inventors of the ’094 patent changed their employer from USF to Mayo Clinic.

article thumbnail

“Shall be the Property” is not an Assignment of Patent Rights

Patently-O

UM did not file any paperwork with the PTO attempting to claim ownership and UM is not a party to the present litigation. The district court sided with Omni — finding that Omni had received rights from the inventor, and that Islam had not assigned his rights to UM. Lets look at the contract. employment. employment.

Patent 99
article thumbnail

USPTO Patent Fees Reduced for Small Businesses

LexBlog IP

However, the cost of obtaining and maintaining patents may be a barrier for individual inventors and small businesses to benefit from the advantage or enter certain markets. government’s spending package, the Consolidated Appropriations Act , for 2023. The UAIA was signed into law on December 29, 2022, and included in the U.S.

article thumbnail

Patenting Inventions Produced in the Course of Employment: Rights and Obligations of Private and Public Sector Employees in Canada

IPilogue

The Patent Act contains no express provisions pertaining to the ownership of inventions produced by an employee during the course of their employment. A written contract including an express contractual term contrary to the presumption of employee ownership also overrides the common law rule. Private Sector Employees.