Remove what-is-likelihood-of-confusion
article thumbnail

Inferring Secondary Meaning from Product Design Copying

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch In patent law, product copying can serve as indirect evidence of non-obviousness. A pending petition before the Supreme Court asks a similar question in the trademark realm – to what extent does copying of a product serve as evidence of secondary meaning of the product associated trade dress.

Copying 59
article thumbnail

Logos Remain Relevant: Source Confusion and Design Patent Infringement

Patently-O

This post will focus on another key issue from the case – the relevance of logos in design patent infringement analysis. Still, ornamental logos found on the accused product can still be relevant as visual distractors in the process of evaluating similarities and differences between the claimed design and accused design.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Trademark Refusal & Copyright Registration Differences

IP and Legal Filings

GENERAL REFUSAL REASONS FOR A TRADEMARK Likelihood of Confusion: The first reason for refusal is that it is often considered that the use of the trademark will lead to confusion with similar trademarks. Trademark: should be easily distinguishable and should be enough to point out the origins of the goods or services.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (September 23-September 29)

SpicyIP

Exploring this issue in a two-part guest post, Bharathwaj Ramakrishnan explains what ANNs are and breaks down the positions of the EU and UK authorities on their patentability. This and a lot more in this week’s SpicyIP Weekly Review. Anything we are missing out on? Drop a comment below to let us know. Drop a comment below to let us know.

article thumbnail

Brand Identifiers are Key to Managing Competition

azrights

They copy business models, and any aspect of a business’ successful branding, be it, by introducing new features, copying its positioning, or even using similar names or brand identifiers. Some will copy blatantly, others are more savvy so will copy what they calculate they can get away with.

article thumbnail

Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute False Advertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet v. Troia

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

” I’ll focus on the false designation of origin claim regarding Troia’s keyword ads. ” I’ll focus on the false designation of origin claim regarding Troia’s keyword ads. ” he purchased keyword ads triggered by “LoanStreet” that displayed excerpts of his posts and linked to them. .”

article thumbnail

Does Anyone Here Have A Sense Of Humor, Redux: Jack Daniel’s v. VIP Oral Argument

LexBlog IP

Whether humorous use of another’s trademark as one’s own on a commercial product is subject to the Lanham Act’s traditional likelihood-of-confusion analysis, or instead receives heightened First Amendment protection from trademark infringement claims. She continued: “Parodies can be confusing. If so, you should not have a dog.