The IPKat

JUNE 27, 2022

Consequently, the definition of NFTs as “certificate of authenticity” or “certificate of ownership” is not accurate. Yuga Labs, therefore, still owns the copyright in each NFT. All this implies the idea that, in the world of NFTs, the IP rights in the digital file are of secondary importance if not outright meaningless.

Non-Fungible Tokens 135

Non-Fungible Tokens Contracts Copying Art 135

43(B)log

AUGUST 11, 2022

common ownership are reciprocal. And it’s not really joint ownership in the real property sense b/c there is always a way out of joint ownership—severance to turn it into tenancy in common, which limits the costs that holdout joint owners can impose on each other. Also: what about derivative works?

Music 56

Music Copyright Ownership Derivative Work 56

IIPRD

APRIL 8, 2024

This article delves into the ongoing debate around the issue of right of ownership of copyright by AI generators for their novel artwork. Stability AI, three artists filed a claim on the basis that their work was used by the AI to train the algorithm and use them in a transformative manner to create new work. [5]

Art 52

Art Artwork Intellectual Property Copyright Law 52

Copyright Lately

MARCH 6, 2023

The company also asserts copyright ownership in two “director’s statements” written by Coakley about the alleged on-set bullying, as well as in Coakley’s planned derivative project about the making of Runt. Copyright Office, claiming ownership through a written agreement with Coakley.

Copyright 77

Copyright Derivative Work Fair Use Social Media 77

Copyright Lately

NOVEMBER 21, 2021

Miramax claims, among other things, that the preparation and sale of these derivative works constitutes copyright infringement because the contractual rights Tarantino reserved in his 1993 agreement with Miramax don’t cover NFTs. Again, NFTs are just an ownership record and a link to content. NFTs Are Not Copyrightable.

Copying 127

Copying Non-Fungible Tokens Contracts Copyright 127

Velocity of Content

MARCH 16, 2023

After all, while we are pondering the weighty issue of future ownership, we are not focusing on the fundamental issue of wholesale copying of works to train AI in a wide variety of situations. This, of course, could be an accident based on true intellectual curiosity, but I do not believe it.

Litigation 98

Litigation Fair Use Copying Derivative Work 98

Kluwer Copyright Blog

DECEMBER 5, 2022

At the same time, AR may be a catalyst for boosting the ecosystem surrounding bodies managing cultural heritage, because an attractive cultural site with entertainment features can definitely have an impact on the local tourism-related industry. Thus, ownership of such rights is crucial for exploitation purposes.

Copyright 103

Copyright Public Domain Art Moral Rights 103

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

Based solely on the complaint that was filed, there are six major issues raised by the case: First, were the recorded interviews a copyright-eligible “work of authorship”? Third, is Trump’s claim of ownership barred by 17 U.S.C. 105 , as a “work of the United States Government”?

Copyright 119

Copyright Blogging Publishing Fair Use 119

Kluwer Copyright Blog

MAY 9, 2023

Does such an output infringe on a copyrighted work of a third party, especially those works “ingested” during the training stage of the AI system? Under US law, is the output a “ derivative work ” of the “ingested” copyrighted works? The Copyright – AI Act interface The first aspect to mention regards definitions.

Copyright 138

Copyright Fair Use Copyright Law Law 138

SpicyIP

NOVEMBER 16, 2023

Hulm asserted ownership of copyright on the app on the basis of a copyright registration of a literary concept note detailing the working of its app, arguing that the app is an adaptation of the literary concept note.

Copyright 59

Copyright Marketing Marketing Copying 59

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 3, 2023

In 1963, Disney expressed skepticism about monopoly aspects of extended term and “expressed doubt that Congress would approve a longer ownership period.” They definitely donated to many committee members but not unusually so. Rosen, Fog and Fiction and Copyright Term Extension aka Who Framed Mickey Mouse? Why are they being awarded?

Copyright 59

Copyright Copying Music Fair Use 59

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

OCTOBER 19, 2021

The Kremen case involved the alleged theft of the sex.com domain name by improperly modifying the electronic records evidencing ownership of the domain name. Website owners can prevent the unauthorized reassignment of their ownership interests, such as someone trying to modify their copyright registration records.

Licensing 88

Licensing Copyright Contracts Advertising 88

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JANUARY 12, 2024

Once we qualify the copies as “electronic,” it becomes unmistakable that this case deals with intangible items, not traditional “chattel” that are, by definition, tangible items. The Ninth Circuit takes this baffling approach in part due to the 20-year-old Sex.com case (Kremen v. ” That’s true.

Copying 75

Copying Ownership Derivative Work Contracts 75

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 17, 2023

According to the complaint, these separate entities are just one big data-sharing family, leveraging their combined resources in non-standard ways such as Microsoft sharing hardware and cloud infrastructure resources in exchange for an ownership interest in OpenAI. Complaint at 31. Plaintiffs attach each of these licenses to the complaint.

Blogging 127

Blogging Licensing Privacy Copyright Notice 127