LexBlog IP

JUNE 15, 2023

In fact, the Supreme Court stressed the significance of source identification in the opinion, explaining, “[W]e hold that [ Rogers ] does not [have merit] when an alleged infringer uses a trademark the way the Lanham Act most cares about: as a designation of source for the infringer’s own goods.”

Trademark 52

Trademark Fair Use Designs Design 52

IP Intelligence

JUNE 15, 2023

In fact, the Supreme Court stressed the significance of source identification in the opinion, explaining, “[W]e hold that [ Rogers ] does not [have merit] when an alleged infringer uses a trademark the way the Lanham Act most cares about: as a designation of source for the infringer’s own goods.”

Trademark 52

Trademark Fair Use Designs Design 52

LexBlog IP

JUNE 16, 2023

On June 8, 2023, the Supreme Court in a unanimous decision held that a trademark claim concerning “a squeaky, chewable dog toy designed to look like a bottle of Jack Daniels whiskey” which, as a play on words, turns the words “Jack Daniels” into “Bad Spaniels” and the descriptive phrase “Old No.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Cease and Desist Trademark Designs 52

LexBlog IP

JUNE 16, 2023

On June 8, 2023, the Supreme Court in a unanimous decision held that a trademark claim concerning “a squeaky, chewable dog toy designed to look like a bottle of Jack Daniels whiskey” which, as a play on words, turns the words “Jack Daniels” into “Bad Spaniels” and the descriptive phrase “Old No.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Cease and Desist Trademark Designs 52

IP Intelligence

JUNE 14, 2023

In fact, the Supreme Court stressed the significance of source identification in the opinion, explaining, “[W]e hold that [ Rogers ] does not [have merit] when an alleged infringer uses a trademark the way the Lanham Act most cares about: as a designation of source for the infringer’s own goods.”

Trademark 40

Trademark Fair Use Designs Design 40

LexBlog IP

MARCH 3, 2023

A trademark can be attacked in a variety of ways, most frequently through arguments that the mark is: Generic, Abandoned for non-use, Misrepresentation to the Trademark Office, and Fair use. 80 (1950) trademark rights were lost because the mark ESCALATOR had become generic and therefore lost its trademark status.

Branding 52

Branding Brands Branding Trademark 52

The IPKat

JULY 22, 2021

The title of this book clearly sets out its premise: trademark protection has encroached into what used to be solely copyright’s domain, resulting in an undesirable over-protection of works which impoverishes the public domain and restricts others’ creative endeavours. Figure 1: Get your paws on this new book y'all!

Trademark 57

Trademark Public Domain Copyright Cease and Desist 57

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 16, 2024

Panel #2, TM, moderated by Vice Dean Felix Wu Jack Daniels says that use as a trademark is special: like copyright’s bête noire, confusion caused by trademark use is the central concern of trademark law. I’ve left out the parts specific to registered trademarks and the reference to treaties.

Trademark 59

Trademark Fair Use Registration False Advertising 59

Copyright Lately

MAY 1, 2023

Within just over a month, a raft of barely-underground Discord servers like AI Hub have popped up to provide users with access to software—and step-by-step instructions—for creating new songs using hundreds of community-made AI models designed to mimic specific artists’ voices.

Music 85

Music Copyright Copying Copyright Law 85

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 19, 2022

Summary of current treatment: Although courts have often referred to “expressive” or “artistic” works as shorthand for the scope of Rogers, they have applied it to speech that quali?es Thus, it may not even be descriptive fair use to use the name of the religion from which the dissenters have parted.

Trademark Law 72

Trademark Law Trademark Art Branding 72

43(B)log

JUNE 24, 2022

Ornamental use may help to maintain rights even if core uses cease. Can it be used in different ways in TM as a thumb on the scale rather than a binary? 2d Cir in Descriptive fair use—how “pure” is the descriptive character of the use? Ilanah Simon: In Europe, you can’t use overlap to police boundaries.

Trademark Law 75

Trademark Law Law Trademark Registration 75

IP and Legal Filings

OCTOBER 28, 2023

A fundamental principle of trademark law permits the owner of a well-known trademark to forbid third parties from using it in a manner that would lessen its distinctiveness. In accordance with a provision of trademark law known as trademark dilution, the owner of a brand may.

Trademark 73

Trademark Registering Trademarks Trademark Law Branding 73

43(B)log

DECEMBER 20, 2022

Plaintiffs also alleged infringement of Monbo’s right of publicity, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Lanham Act and related Maryland trademark law. In addition, the design of the title of the 2013 Documentary was allegedly similar to plaintiffs’ registered 12 O’Clock Boyz logo. The similarities in setting, theme, etc.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Trademark Copyright Editing 52

LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 29, 2022

19 The distinctive character of a trade mark must be assessed by reference, first, to the goods or services in respect of which registration is sought and, second, to the perception of the relevant public (see judgment of 12 February 2004, Henkel, C‑218/01, EU:C:2004:88, paragraph 50 and the case-law cited).

Trademark 52

Trademark Registration Music Intellectual Property 52

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

The Division Bench judgement was passed on October 13, in response to the reference made by a Single Judge Bench where the Court disagreed with the finding of the coordinate bench in Boehringer Ingelheim v. Controller of Patents & Designs Patent Office Mumbai. Controller of Patents and Designs and Raytheon Company v.

IP 124

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 124

Patently-O

JUNE 8, 2023

The holding is that the First Amendment does not require any special scrutiny in cases where the accused activity is “the use of trademarks as trademarks.” ” Rather in this use-as-a-mark situation, standard principles of trademark law apply. 1125(c)(3)(A).

Trademark Law 69

Trademark Law Trademark Law Fair Use 69

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 21, 2023

Ramsey is a Professor of Law at the University of San Diego School of Law. She writes and teaches in the trademark law area, and recently wrote a paper with Professor Christine Haight Farley that focuses on speech-protective doctrines in trademark infringement law.] By Guest Blogger Lisa P. Ramsey [Lisa P.

Trademark 100

Trademark Blogging Trademark Law Fair Use 100

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 1, 2023

VIP Products, on the other hand, argued that their toy was protected under the doctrine of “fair use” as it was being used in a non-trademark sense, and that it was not likely to cause confusion among consumers. ” ( at 36 ). .” That remains in the realm of the art critic.

Trademark 52

Trademark Intellectual Property Branding Brands 52

43(B)log

JUNE 24, 2022

Does the ornamentality doctrine have doctrinal purchase elsewhere in trademark law? In the fair use calculus? In what ways is the ornamental nature of a defendant’s use relevant to defences based on artistic or expressive use (or some other defence)? But there is a defense for nondistinctive use.

Trademark Law 56

Trademark Law Law Trademark Fair Use 56

43(B)log

NOVEMBER 8, 2023

Trademark: In Jack Daniel’s v. VIP Products, the Court held that it did not need to apply or even decide the validity of a speech-protective limit on trademark law designed to prevent trademark owners from shutting down expressive works that comment on trademarks, known as the Rogers test.

False Advertising 75

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Trademark 75