Remove patent-reexamination
article thumbnail

Proposal to Elevate Patent Reexamination Antithetical to AIA Statutes

LexBlog IP

Reexamination Deference? Presenting all ideas to the public as opposed to culling out the more (ahem)… “creative,” showcases the open mindedness of the administration—particularly to patent owners. This statute is also expressly extended to patent reexamination.

Patent 52
article thumbnail

CAFC Affirms Obviousness of Memory Cell Design Patents Over Dyk Dissent

IP Watchdog

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a pair of final written decisions at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) invalidating patent claims owned by Monterey Research and covering improved static random access memory (SRAM) cell designs.

Designs 59
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

How to Challenge a Design Patent Application

Patent Trademark Blog

Mission Impossible: Can you block a design patent application? Design patent applications are not publicly viewable. It can be nearly impossible to figure out what design patent applications are pending. Suppose your competitor indicates that their product is patent-pending. This will be tricky.

article thumbnail

Top 3 Ways to Defend Patent Infringement Claims

Patent Trademark Blog

How do you defend a patent infringement claim? Accusations of patent infringement should be taken seriously. Whether they are asserted in the form of cease-and-desist letter or an Amazon patent violation, an accused infringer needs to gauge the seriousness of the problem. Do the accused products infringe the asserted patent?

article thumbnail

Differences Noticeable to “General Consumers” May Be Considered “Significant Differences” Which Render the Design Patentable Over Prior Designs

LexBlog IP

The Patent Reexamination and Invalidation Department (PRID) of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) maintained the validity of Chinese design patent No. the ’645 patent) in an invalidation proceeding. [1] the ’645 patent) in an invalidation proceeding. [1] 48204, see.

Designs 40
article thumbnail

In Re: Cellect, LLC No. 2022-1293 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 28, 2023)

LexBlog IP

This case addresses how Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) interacts with obviousness-type double patenting (ODP). for infringement of four patents. Subsequently, Samsung requested four ex parte reexaminations asserting that the patents were unpatentable based on ODP, which was not raised by the examiner during prosecution.

Designs 52
article thumbnail

[Conference Report] Patents, truth, PCT and more at the UIC School of Law International IP Practice Seminar

The IPKat

Back in October, University of Illinois Chicago School of Law’s Center for Intellectual Property (“IP”), Information, and Privacy Law organized and virtually hosted its International IP Practice Seminar. Jorgenson discussed her new appointment as WIPO’s first IP and Gender Champion. Adam Ernette (UIC) reports on the seminar.