Remove patent-reexamination
article thumbnail

Requester Side Benchmarks for Successful Reexamination Requests

JD Supra Law

Takeaways: -A requester can have a voice in ex parte reexamination prosecution. Requesters should strategically structure their request documents to hedge against potential patent owner amendment and argument.

Patent 68
article thumbnail

Proving Printed Publications

Patently-O

Folks continue to file anonymous ex parte reexaminations. Design Patent No. The reexamination examiner agreed with the challenge and issued a final rejection that the claimed design was anticipated by four different prior art references. Ex parte Zhang , Reexam No. 90/014,234, 2021 WL 633718 (PTAB).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Challenging the Validity of a Patent: The Supreme Court Minerva Decision

More Than Your Mark

Hologic, Incorporated that the doctrine of assignor estoppel (a rule that prevents people who assign their patents to a company from then challenging the validity of their patent) is alive and well, but subject to certain important exceptions. The Validity of a Patent. Contact Norris McLaughlin about Patent Protections.

article thumbnail

A Request for Grace Period for a Novelty Art Should Be Submitted Within Two Months When the Patentee Knew or Should Have Known About the Novelty Art After the Patent Application Was Filed

LexBlog IP

The Patent Reexamination and Invalidation Department (PRID) of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) invalidated the CN Invention Patent No. within six months before the priority date of the ’987 patent), and all the inventors of the ’987 patent are also authors of the article.

Art 52
article thumbnail

The Five Biggest Mistakes the USPTO is Seeing in Expungement and Reexamination Petitions—and How to Avoid Making Them Yourself

LexBlog IP

Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) has received more than 170 petitions for expungement and reexamination since it began accepting these new filings late last year. §1066(A) and reexamination pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § § 1066(B). § 2.91(d)(2) § 11.303(d).

article thumbnail

What to Know About the USPTO’s Duty of Candor Guidance Regarding FDA Submissions

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

Information and statements” may include, among other items, information that “refutes, or is inconsistent with, a position that the applicant takes in” either “opposing an argument of unpatentability relied on by the Office” or “asserting an argument of patentability.”. the party has a duty to submit the information to the USPTO.”.

article thumbnail

CAFC Endorses PTAB Treatment of Admitted Art

LexBlog IP

Last summer, a guidance memo was issued to the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) on the use of Applicant Admitted Prior Art (AAPA) in IPR proceedings. ” The earlier memo explained: [A}ny patent that is used as the “basis of’ a request for inter partes review must be a prior art patent, not the challenged patent.

Art 52