article thumbnail

Fourth Circuit Issues a Bummer Fair Use Ruling–Philpot v. IJR

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

In 2013, Philpot uploaded the photo to Wikimedia Commons, which is governed by the standard Creative Commons license requiring attribution. Philpot claims his standard photo licensing fee is $3,500, but reuses of the photo from Wikipedia Commons didn’t require any payment (just attribution). ” Market Effect.

article thumbnail

5th Cir affirms fair use on a motion to dismiss, fee award to D

43(B)log

25, 2022) “The softball team and flag corps at a public high school outside Fort Worth used their Twitter accounts to post a motivational passage from sports psychologist Keith Bell’s book, Winning Isn’t Normal.” He sued; the court of appeals affirms a finding of fair use on a motion to dismiss and an award of attorneys’ fees.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Court Finds Tweet To Be Fair Use

LexBlog IP

The WIN Passage is subject to a separate copyright registration and he offers licenses for its use. The school district removed both posts and told Bell it was a “teachable moment” After settlement negotiations broke down, Bell sued for copyright infringement.

article thumbnail

“The Copyright Case of the Century”: Final Settlement between Google and Oracle on API Copyright Infringement

IPilogue

It started out in 2010 when Oracle sued Google for copying the application programming interfaces (APIs) of Java, a programming language developed and licensed by Sun Microsystems and later acquired by Oracle, in Google’s development of the Android operating system. The case meandered through constant reversals of judicial judgements.

article thumbnail

3 Count: Clubbed Penguin

Plagiarism Today

The court, in this case, rejected the test as well as Newsweek’s fair use arguments. The terms of the settlement have not been disclosed. The 3 Count Logo was created by Justin Goff and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. 3: Emily Ratajkowski Lawsuit Over Paparazzi Photo Settles.

article thumbnail

Are Memes Dangerous?

LexBlog IP

But wait, shouldn’t the Fair Use Doctrine imputed under the First Amendment apply to an obviously parodied creative work? All meme-like images in this article are properly licensed. Table of Contents: Fair Use Under the Copyright Act How much risk are we talking here? Yes and no. What about meme generators?

article thumbnail

Copyright Conundrums in the Tattoo World

Nelligan Law

Entertainment furnish invaluable insights into how the subtleties of copyright law and the doctrine of fair use are navigated differently in the context of tattooing, reshaping the legal terrain for artists and copyright custodians alike. Conversely, the confidential settlement reached in S. Victor Whitmill vs. Warner Bros.